Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

As I said, I dont agree with the policy personally, and I have my concerns about BSA’s future, but I cant take time to repost what I already said. Follow my posts or dont if you want.


95 posted on 06/04/2013 3:10:17 PM PDT by Magnum44 (I have had just about enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44; DBeers
I don't know whether your statement that I quoted:

So I think people saying that BSA is now condoning gay lifestyle is incorrect, or an overstatement.

Is your opinion from reading the same articles everyone else has read, or from some other source. I read much of the thread but don't know if I read every single comment you made. Either way, it's sort of like the military now allowing faggots. Certainly there were sex perverts before, but they had to keep quiet about it and not display themselves. Now they can be "open" about being perverts. Same thing will happen in the BSA. Officially allowing "open" homosexuals is tantamount to condoning, or in truth, promoting perversion, and I'm at a loss to see it any other way. Exactly as what has happened in the military.

99 posted on 06/04/2013 4:35:48 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson