Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

Actually, no! Romney received 792,814 fewer votes in 2012 than what McLame received in 2008. Try looking up the numbers like I did.

You could say Romney received a higher percentage of the vote, which he did (47.2 vs 45.6); or that Romney received more electoral votes (206 - 173). But, that was not the point I made.

Obozo received 6,841,491 fewer votes in 2012 than 2008. If people claiming to have love of country, and who opposed the evils of Obozo, had voted for Romney instead of staying home, casting no vote at the top, or voting turd party, Romney would be the President, and Obozo would be sitting on the sidelines.


99 posted on 06/03/2013 5:22:24 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: SoldierDad

Here’s Fed. Gov. totals:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/historical.html

Here’s Dave Leip’s:
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/


100 posted on 06/03/2013 5:24:57 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: SoldierDad

I don’t know where you are looking up those numbers, but they are just wrong. Romney gained a million votes and won a higher percentage of the total vote.

John McCain: 59,934,814 45.7%
Mitt Romney: 60,932,152 47.2%

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showelection.php?year=2008


109 posted on 06/04/2013 7:34:50 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson