Posted on 06/01/2013 5:31:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
White and Hispanic turnout fell from 2004 to 2012, according to a new study by the Center for Immigration Studies based on newly-released U.S. Census data.
Had turnout equaled what it was in 2004, 4.7 million more whites would have voted in 2012, of which 4.2 million were not college graduates, according to the study.
Obama received five million more votes than Romney.
“As Republicans think about how they can expand their voter base, the new data suggest that one of their biggest problems in the last presidential election was that so many less-educated whites sat home,” said Steven Camarota, CIS’ director of research and author of the report. CIS favors low levels of legal immigration
“These voters, who have been hit hard by the recession, have traditionally supported Republicans,” Camarota said. “It seems likely that by supporting the Schumer-Rubio amnesty, GOP legislators would further alienate these voters.”
To win the popular vote with female support, Romney would have needed four extra percentage points of the women’s vote (48 percent rather than the 44 he actually received), with each percentage point equating to 714,000 votes.
To earn the popular vote with blacks and Hispanics, Romney would have needed an extra 15 or 23 percentage points, respectively. But the statistics regarding whites demonstrated how closely the Republican candidate came to a plurality win.
With one percentage point of the white vote equating to 980,000 votes, Romney would have won the popular vote with a mere three percent greater turnout.
Ditto.
You would invoke the nuclear war fighting principle “use it or lose it” and not commit all your forces to a certain outcome?
Not exactly.
It now appears some groups of moslem savages just need to be wiped out. We can do it without taking out a city.
If the local populace decides to take them out, or turn them over to avoid further damage....good.
If not, we can eliminate the city or region. How long we going to keep pussyfooting around?
You add in the following, and Romney wouldn’t even place:
1. Full disclosure on Romney’s Progressive Liberal record.
2. Closed Republican Primaries.
Thank you.
I agree about the candidates...the point was on who wins historically. Northeastern liberal republican...a statistical shoe in to loose. Look at history and find the last Northeastern republican to win a national election....it is just fact.
The problem is that the heads of the party, knows as well as I do, historically and statistically what wins national elections for them and they chose to lose in a year that they could have blown this election out of the water in a Reagan landslide.
Things that make you go hmmmm....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.