and what is worse is that there used to be alternative-derived vaccines, but more and more these have been discontinued. or docs will just tell you the vaccines arent from aborted tissue lines when they are. you’re a peon, how will you ever prove different?
If it really came down to needing THIS, a few spare cells which the fetus would never miss could probably be gotten from patients of in-utero surgery, and then these cells could be multiplied in the lab to the hearts’ desire of scientists. No ethical shadow at all. But I keep wondering if it is lobbies of the godless, rather than even “disinterested” science, that comes up with this. Normally the unborn don’t GET these diseases. Why would their cells be logical growth media for them?
What is best, a vaccine that is targeted to a virus that infects a Human, or a Chicken?
Vaccines have been targeted where possible to humans for the best part of the last 50 years. Technology continues to add methods where some vaccines and medicines that were rendered from animal tissue, like most were originally, have now where possible been better targeted to human cells and as a result more effective, longer lasting, just better...
So what's the answer here...Do we label it as immoral to use discarded human tissue and just chuck it? or do we use it to better the medical profession and it's capabilities?
That answer is clear to me, but for some it seems not. I think that if explained in full and a vote taken the results would be clearly in favor of not wasting the tissue. But if not, I frankly don't have any young children, even my grand kids are beyond vaccine age, so I really don't care. I'll leave it up to those with something to lose.