What is best, a vaccine that is targeted to a virus that infects a Human, or a Chicken?
Vaccines have been targeted where possible to humans for the best part of the last 50 years. Technology continues to add methods where some vaccines and medicines that were rendered from animal tissue, like most were originally, have now where possible been better targeted to human cells and as a result more effective, longer lasting, just better...
So what's the answer here...Do we label it as immoral to use discarded human tissue and just chuck it? or do we use it to better the medical profession and it's capabilities?
That answer is clear to me, but for some it seems not. I think that if explained in full and a vote taken the results would be clearly in favor of not wasting the tissue. But if not, I frankly don't have any young children, even my grand kids are beyond vaccine age, so I really don't care. I'll leave it up to those with something to lose.
Why such a pressing need to get the media from FETUSES? Why not from plain old human volunteers. Why so easily breach the moral bright lines that used to exist? The strange rush to do so is cause for pause; I do not believe “disinterested science” is behind this.
what it is made from is just a growth medium. we could make all vaccines without aborted tissue. there is no difference in effectiveness, and as i said there used to be vaccines that were made without aborted tissue, and they were identical in effectiveness.
We label it as immoral to make "discarded human tissue".
You are nothing but a pro-death obot.
IBTZ.
What a good argument for abortion. It’s for “the children”. Makes perfect sense to a liberal. Where does that put you?
Gee. I bet you support the use of “research” by doctors like Mengele, too.