Seems like maybe something happened to Lamberth sometime between March 2010 (when Lamberth was going to insist that both DOJ and CIA wrong-doing be reported to Congress) and Nov 2010 (when Lamberth overruled 2 other judges and allowed the warrant to be kept hidden from Rosen).
April 14, 2010 was when Lamberth dismissed Orly Taitz’ petition for Quo Warranto, saying “”The Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”. This was after Taitz was advised by Judge David Carter - after he abruptly did a 180 on her case before him shortly after hiring a clerk from the same law firm that was defending Obama at the time - that the proper venue for her issues was Quo Warranto. And then Lamberth blew it off by mocking the whole idea of a “conspiracy”.
In 2011 Lamberth dismissed Taitz’ FOIA appeal for a redacted application for the SS# that Obama is using. In August and October of 2011 Lamberth ruled against Orly in 2 other cases, saying “”As her numerous filings with the Court demonstrate, plaintiff will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of this alleged conspiracy. Unfortunately for plaintiff, today is not her lucky day.” and noted her “Sisyphean quest”. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orly_Taitz )
Probably not a lot of love lost there, because Taitz accused Lamberth of having an ex parte meeting with Eric Holder, IIRC. But his decisions in 2011 seem to be unprofessional - more like the language we expect from the threatened media.
Somebody mentioned Lamberth as covering for Bill Clinton earlier. I’m wondering if the dems know some good dirt on him, that gets brought up at critical times...
Oops. Correction: It was not Lamberth that Taitz accused of meeting with Eric Holer; it was Judge Land. So there is no personal reason for Lamberth to be hostile to Taitz, that I am aware of.