Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Bombers Perform Simulated Strikes on Sweden, U.S.
The New American ^ | 5/17/2013 | Christian Gomez

Posted on 05/18/2013 7:52:52 AM PDT by IbJensen

On May 6, Russia received its first shipment of Sukhoi Su-34 twin-seat fighter-bombers (known by NATO as "Fullback"). The Su-34 is the newest generation of fighter-bombers intended to replace the outdated Soviet-era Sukhoi Su-24s.

While the modernization of the Russian Air Force may — and rightfully so — raise a few eyebrows of concern, this alone is not sufficient cause for alarm. Russia’s recent air force maneuvers are, however.

On the night of March 29, 2013, two Russian Tupolev Tu-22M3 bombers (known by NATO as "Backfires"), escorted by four Russian Sukhoi Su-27 fighters (known by NATO as "Flankers") passed extremely close to Swedish airspace and simulated an aerial "attack" on Stockholm and southern Sweden. The Tu-22M3 is a new supersonic long-range bomber capable of delivering nuclear weapons to overseas targets.

The six Russian aircraft flew dangerously close to Swedish airspace, roughly 20 miles from Sweden’s territorial borders, according to Business Insider.

While Russian military aircraft flying over the Baltic has become routine since Russian President Vladimir Putin restored the old Soviet-era long-range strategic flights in 2011, what makes this particular flight so concerning was Sweden’s lack of readiness. The Swedish Air Force was caught off guard and failed to respond.

The flights occurred on Good Friday at around 2 a.m. local time. Business Insider reported that “at least two JAS-39 Gripen should always be in a QRA (Quick Reaction Alert) and ready for take off in case of alarm, but quite surprisingly there were no interceptors ready on Good Friday night.”

Instead of Swedish fighters, two Danish F-16 fighter jets under NATO command intercepted and escorted the Russian planes safely away from Sweden’s borders.

While Sweden may be grateful to Denmark’s Royal Danish Air Force, this raises serious concerns over Sweden's ability to repel and/or deter aggression against its national borders. This incident also raises concerns over the increased belligerence on the part of Russia.

Massive military reductions to the Swedish Armed Forces may account for the air force’s lack of readiness. During the 1980s, the Swedish Air Force was comprised of 20 squadrons and over 400 planes. Today, it posseses no more than four squadrons and less than 150 planes. Meanwhile Russia increased its military spending 16 percent in 2012, primarily on new weapons systems and the modernization of outdated military hardware.

A month later, on the night of April 28, two Russian Tupolev Tu-95 (known by NATO as "Bear-H"; shown, above) long-range heavy nuclear bombers “were detected flying into the military’s Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) near the Aleutians, where a strategic missile defense radar is located,” according to the Washington Free Beacon.

Again, the Russian bombers did not penetrate Alaskan or U.S. airspace, but they did fly dangerously close to it, prompting two U.S. F-22 fighter jets to scramble from Elmendorf Air Force Base. Bill Gertz of the Washington Free Beacon writes, “The dispatch of F-22s is an indication the bomber flights posed a potential threat to U.S. territory. It was the fifth incident of Russian strategic bombers flying against the United States since June, when Bear bombers were intercepted near Alaska during a large-scale Russian strategic nuclear exercise that Russian military officials said involved practice strikes against U.S. missile defense sites in Alaska.”

On February 12, two of the same class of Russian Tu-95 Bear-H strategic bombers flew over and encircled Guam. This also prompted a quick U.S. deployment of F-15s to intercept and escort the Russian bombers away from U.S. airspace.

Although Putin announced to the world that Russia would conduct such flights in 2011, two Russian Tu-95 bombers made a round-trip surprise “visit” to Guam in 2007 for the first time since the alleged end of the Cold War.

“Who told you that the Cold War was ever over? It transforms; it is like a virus,” said Russian KGB/FSB defector Sergei Tretyakov in an interview with FOX News in 2009.

In 2007, Russian President Vladimir Putin reiterated the continuation of the Cold War by threatening the West with a “new spiral in the arms race.” In Putin’s KGB eyes the Cold War never ended; it is ongoing. Meanwhile, the West applauds Putin as a close ally on the War on Terror. With allies like Putin are enemies really necessary?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cowardlymuslimpres; enemiesoftheusa; israel; lousyusgovernment; military; obama; obamasfault; russia; sweden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: AppyPappy

Speak English. American bankers financed America, England and Germany during WWII. I have never seen, or at least I don’t recall any historical articles about who financed Japan.


81 posted on 05/19/2013 3:28:48 PM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Then they must learn.


82 posted on 05/19/2013 6:41:52 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

But Korea and Vietnam were extensions of WWII.

The armies our troops were fighting were backed and funded by the USSR. This way they were able to fight us without exposing their own troops.

As far as FDR and his Democrat Party is concerned we have met the enemy and he lives in Washington.

Today, if one can imagine it, the situation is even worse thanks to the weasel and his allies huddled down in what I refer to now as the White Hut.


83 posted on 05/19/2013 7:00:55 PM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

After the onset of hostilities the Germans didn’t need our banks anymore. They had control of French banks and looted them. Along with looting the valuables and gold teeth from concentration camp inmates all of which they funneled through Swiss banks. A little known secret however is that the really discreet and very secretive bankers are those in the little principality of Licthenstien. Licthenatien it is said is ‘’where the Swiss go to hide their money’’.


84 posted on 05/19/2013 8:41:37 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

“War is politics by other means.’’ Von Clauswitz.


85 posted on 05/19/2013 8:42:55 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

>>”In his book, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Professor Antony Sutton (pictured right), author of nineteen books, provides a thoroughly documented account of the role played by Morgan, Rockefeller, General Electric Company, Standard Oil, National City Bank, Chase and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, General Motors, Ford, and other industrialists, in helping to finance the Nazis. To prove his point, Professor Sutton provides bank statements, letters from U.S. ambassadors, mainstream media sources, Congressional Records, excerpts from Congressional Investigations, and statements from the Nuremberg trials. Wall Street’s funding of the Nazis is part of authentic history.

Professor Sutton wrote that “General Motors, Ford, General Electric, DuPont,” and other “U.S. companies intimately involved with the development of Nazi Germany were ... controlled by the Wall Street elite,” such as “the J.P. Morgan firm, the Rockefeller Chase Bank and to a lesser extent the Warburg Manhattan bank.”<<

http://www.thehiddenevil.com/nazis.asp


86 posted on 05/19/2013 9:58:10 PM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Ping to #86


87 posted on 05/19/2013 9:59:17 PM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

And then Hitler invaded Europe and found money elsewhere. Those firms who helped should have had their own Nuremburg trials.


88 posted on 05/19/2013 10:33:04 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I believe that is known as “conjecture”. Lending money to people in a foreign country isn’t necessarily funding their regime. Germany was on the fast track and it was good business to fund businesses that were successful. Banks lend money to American chemical and steel companies all the time. It doesn’t mean the bank supports Obama.

How many of those loans had Hitler’s signature on them? None.


89 posted on 05/20/2013 5:37:36 AM PDT by AppyPappy (You never see a massacre at a gun show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Everything moves because of money. When the DoD says we are interested in buying W, Y and Z, companies put in bids to sell W, Y and Z. If they get the bid they will then make W, Y and Z and deliver it to the DoD.

Hitler didn’t put forth any requests for bids but the German DoD most certainly did.

If the loans weren’t made to the manufacturing companies there would NOT be any supplies with which to fight the wars.


90 posted on 05/20/2013 8:49:03 AM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

HITLERS BOY SOLDIERS

The shocking fanaticism and reckless bravery of the Hitler Youth in battle astounded the British and Canadians who fought them. They sprang like wolves against tanks. If they were encircled or outnumbered, they fought-on until there were no survivors. Young boys, years away from their first shave, had to be shot dead by Allied soldiers, old enough, in some cases, to be their fathers. The “fearless, cruel, domineering” youth Hitler had wanted had now come of age and arrived on the battlefield with utter contempt for danger and little regard for their own lives. This soon resulted in the near destruction of the entire division.

http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/hitleryouth/hj-boy-soldiers.htm


91 posted on 05/22/2013 5:16:34 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson