House immigration group announces 'agreement in principle'

The Hill (Hat tip to Pat Dollard) ^ | 05/16/13 06:19 PM ET | Russell Berman

[man_in_tx]

A bipartisan group of House negotiators said Thursday it has reached an “agreement in principle” on comprehensive immigration reform legislation.

“We have an agreement in principle,” Rep. John Carter (R-Tex.) said as he and five other members of the group emerged from a two-hour meeting late Thursday afternoon.

[Iron Munro]

Another $200 Trillion Dollar sell out.

But it’s Bi-Partisan - isn’t that great?

/s

[sickoflibs]

RE :”With a bipartisan bill moving ahead in the Senate, the House negotiators had faced pressure from Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to complete its proposal to allow the House to put its stamp on the immigration debate. Earlier Thursday, Boehner had said he was “concerned” about the group’s inability to strike a deal.”

The weeping fool is worried there might not be a deal with Dems.

It says the House bill will also have path to citizenship.

[advance_copy]

You all realize that this IRS/Benghazi/AP stuff is just a diversion while they plop this amnesty bill on us, right?

[genghis]

before they pass any more laws
maybe it would be a good idea to figure out what went wrong last time in 86.

[Eagles6]

I agree.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” It says the House bill will also have path to citizenship. “

I think it is high time for a 5 Million Man Patriot March on D.C.

[Starboard]

I’ll give them the bread because that’s who I am
*********
It may be more blessed to give than to receive, but there’s got to be conditions on generosity. In situations such as the ones you’re referring to, history shows receivers usually don’t appreciate what they’re given; in fact it usually encourages them to demand even more.

Before giving, there has to be a positive action (initiative or sacrifice) on behalf of the reicpient. Otherwise the gift can actually be destructive in the long run.