To: EternalVigilance
That is head spinning logic.
It is legal for the mother to murder the baby -- because it must be a 'non-person' lump of tissue. If the (scum) boyfriend induces the murder - it is recognized that the baby really is a person...
Which one is it - lump of tissue, or person?
There is only one answer, and not two (depending on who initiates the murder).
13 posted on
05/16/2013 10:14:55 AM PDT by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: El Cid
Which one is it - lump of tissue, or person?
I guess the mother gets to decide.
17 posted on
05/16/2013 10:21:32 AM PDT by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: El Cid
“That is head spinning logic.
It is legal for the mother to murder the baby — because it must be a ‘non-person’ lump of tissue. If the (scum) boyfriend induces the murder - it is recognized that the baby really is a person...”
BA Theorum #4- Never expect liberalism to make sense or be consistant. Their positions are based on what best advances their agenda TODAY.
24 posted on
05/16/2013 10:40:32 AM PDT by
Brooklyn Attitude
(Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson