Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. Considers Mandatory $250K Insurance Policy for Gun Buyers
WUSA-TV / The Associated Press ^ | May 16, 2013

Posted on 05/16/2013 7:06:41 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The D.C. Council is considering requiring people to purchase liability insurance before they can get a license to own a gun.

The bill would mandate that prospective gun owners maintain at least a $250,000 policy. The policy would cover damages from negligent acts or intentional acts that aren’t undertaken in self-defense.

A handful of states are considering similar measures, but none has passed such a law....

(Excerpt) Read more at washington.cbslocal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: banglist; dc; democrats; districtofcolumbia; guncontrol; insurance; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: SampleMan

Bodyguard and security companies already carry millions of dollars of liability insurance.


21 posted on 05/16/2013 7:24:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A federal law should be passed that whatever ID, background, insurance, whatever is required of gun owners by a state, the same should be required to get a voters registration card.

Both are Constitutional Rights.


22 posted on 05/16/2013 7:24:48 AM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Dole are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m really interested in seeing the no doubt detailed explanation of how they plan to enforce this with thugs, gang members, drug dealers, etc.

I expect the gun to person ratio is much higher in that part of the population than any other.

Any policy that does not address this is just a joke.


23 posted on 05/16/2013 7:25:14 AM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
“Not everyone has health insurance, but that doesn’t mean you can’t go to the ER if you have a heart attack. You’ll just have to pay the hospital for services rendered, as is customary with any service provider.”

Some won't pay the hospital. My husband had to have a serious operation and the day before was put in a room with another patient. The other patient was dirty. A nurse came in with a form for the man to sign so some money would go to the hospital - it was likely a Medicaid form. The man said he wasn't signing anything and they had to treat him.

I followed the nurse out and ask her to move my husband to another room as the man was filthy and they would use the same bathroom. They moved my husband out of that room right away.

What was the hospital going to do about this man? They can't turn away anyone can they? He wasn't signing anything so did the hospital have to eat the expense?

24 posted on 05/16/2013 7:25:53 AM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ll be sure to purchase some.

Right after dim-bulb-crats are required to purchase intelligence insurance.


25 posted on 05/16/2013 7:28:18 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

What insurance company is going to sign a policy for INTENTIONAL ACTS NOT UNDERTAKEN IN DEFENSE?

(Aka MURDER)

Negligent acts, yes, but those are covered under regular insurance already.


26 posted on 05/16/2013 7:29:40 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Stamp Act


27 posted on 05/16/2013 7:30:08 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Auto’s are not a right and even the idiots at the supreme court would not allow a special tax on guns like they did with O-care.


28 posted on 05/16/2013 7:31:01 AM PDT by edcoil (If you can't change the rules, then ignore them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

That’s the whole point. No company will issue such policies, so they get their gun ban on noncriminals.


29 posted on 05/16/2013 7:31:23 AM PDT by Ingtar (Everyone complains about the weather, but only Liberals try to legislate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think this is covered under your home owners liability insurance. NRA covers some of it if you are a member. Probably wouldn’t cost much unless the government gets involved in it.


30 posted on 05/16/2013 7:34:39 AM PDT by macglencoe (You see what the left hand is doing, but you should be watching the right hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
“I’ll be sure to purchase some. Right after dim-bulb-crats are required to purchase intelligence insurance.”

First, they have to know you have a gun. States that make you register before or when you buy a gun, would know you had one or more.

In Texas, no one knows what you have. The form you fill out when you buy a gun, doesn't list what the gun is or how many you bought and that form isn't reported to the state. And firearms from long ago before the form was required, wouldn't be known either.

I can't see Texas doing this ‘cause our state government hates anything that impinges our right to weapons.

31 posted on 05/16/2013 7:37:15 AM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Freepers, your Contributions make every difference!
Please keep ‘em coming! Thank you all very much!


Proposed Bill Would Force Gun Owners in NY to Buy At Least $1 MILLION in Liability Insurance or Forfeit ‘Privilege’ to Own a Firearm
32 posted on 05/16/2013 7:38:03 AM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: edcoil
RE :”Auto’s are not a right and even the idiots at the supreme court would not allow a special tax on guns like they did with O-care.”

You are very optimistic. The SCOTUS including Scalia have already ruled that the 2nd Amendment is not a completely nonrestrictive right.

33 posted on 05/16/2013 7:38:28 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Home rule should be rescinded for DC. They are doing a terrible job and consistently violating the people’s rights. Or, alternatively, the Congress should pass a law which abrogates the right of the DC City Council to legislate in the area of guns. As many states have done to reign in their big city libtard politicians and citizens.


34 posted on 05/16/2013 7:46:37 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

“I’m really interested in seeing the no doubt detailed explanation of how they plan to enforce this with thugs, gang members, drug dealers, etc.”

There’s a soft spot in obama’s heart for thugs, so just a guess, but it’ll more than likely fall under a “no fault” insurance clause of some sort.

That way, all forms of thuggery will be covered by law-abiding citizens.


35 posted on 05/16/2013 7:47:08 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
I agree. He was blackmailed. His children are Irish and it’s against the law to adopt children out of Ireland. I think they flew the mother to another country to give birth.
36 posted on 05/16/2013 7:47:20 AM PDT by sunny48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Youngman542012

they did.


37 posted on 05/16/2013 7:51:20 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The “DC Council” is a creature of Congress, which can alter or abolish it at will, as well as pre-empt any “legislation” which they happen to pass.

I have been advocating for years for Congress to pass CCW reciprocity for DC only (Congress has no right to do this for States).


38 posted on 05/16/2013 7:52:32 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

We had to eat the expense.


39 posted on 05/16/2013 7:53:32 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

ya, good question. Are the youth gangs who terrorize the streets of DC going to buy their insurance policies?


40 posted on 05/16/2013 7:56:56 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson