Skip to comments.
Exclusive: Holder Says 'No' to Special Counsel to Investigate Benghazi
breitbart.com ^
| 5/15/13
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 05/15/2013 7:07:26 PM PDT by Justaham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
1
posted on
05/15/2013 7:07:26 PM PDT
by
Justaham
To: Justaham
This will make Congress go for impeachment...
To: Justaham
I for one am very surprised. /S
3
posted on
05/15/2013 7:09:10 PM PDT
by
Fzob
(In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Jefferson)
To: Justaham
4
posted on
05/15/2013 7:09:33 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: Justaham
To: Justaham
Chicago style corruption — at the highest levels of government.
6
posted on
05/15/2013 7:10:41 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Justaham
If he doesn’t want to do his job, he needs to resign and give it to somebody who does. I’m sick of all of the corruption going on during his “watch”. He’s a disgrace to every Attorney General this country has ever had.
7
posted on
05/15/2013 7:10:45 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(If you think ObamaCare is a train wreck, wait until you see the amnesty bill.)
To: Justaham
Why should he?
He supports ANY al Qaeda over any American.
That includes the murdered, raped, Ambassador
that they shamelessly used
.... and discarded like a rag.
8
posted on
05/15/2013 7:11:12 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: Justaham
Obama and Holder belong behind bars.
Wake up America, thugs are trying to steal your country.
9
posted on
05/15/2013 7:11:42 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(Psalm 46)
To: BenLurkin
The punk puke thug dog needs to be brought down. Holder too.
10
posted on
05/15/2013 7:11:43 PM PDT
by
shankbear
(The tree of Liberty appears to be perishing because there are few patriots willing to refresh it.)
To: Justaham
Congress doesn’t need the approval of the Attorney General to get a Special Counsel to Investigate the Crime of the Obama Administration.
They can appoint one.Just like they did for the Nixon Tapes.
11
posted on
05/15/2013 7:13:10 PM PDT
by
puppypusher
(The World is going to the dogs.)
To: shankbear
To: Sacajaweau
It should make them move in that direction.
They could be looking at a year of evidence gathering and then a rude awakening after the mid-terms.
13
posted on
05/15/2013 7:14:32 PM PDT
by
Ouchthatonehurt
("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
To: Justaham
But DoJ sill responsible for investigating IRS targeting special groups.
14
posted on
05/15/2013 7:15:52 PM PDT
by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Justaham
Holder’s job has always been to block for Obama. The real question is “Who is the coach for the Obama team?” And it isn’t Obama.
15
posted on
05/15/2013 7:16:06 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Justaham
Obama needs to rein his boy in.
16
posted on
05/15/2013 7:16:16 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: puppypusher
I thought Nixon finally relented and approved a Special Counsel. (Before he fired, then hired, then fired his AG’s!!) I was but a wee youngin’ then, so I could be remembering wrong.
17
posted on
05/15/2013 7:17:02 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
To: puppypusher
(The World is going to the dogs.) An event better than what we have now.
18
posted on
05/15/2013 7:17:23 PM PDT
by
Postman
(........................................................Flies get too little credit)
To: Justaham
To me it was a dumb question to ask.
Whoever asked it knew the answer before it was asked.
Holder is not going to investigate his butt buddy Obama nor Hillary concussion Clinton.
19
posted on
05/15/2013 7:18:38 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Justaham
So what were they covering up in Benghazi? Had to be more than just covering up complete and total incompetence on the part of the Secretary of State. It just makes no sense to take away security in a wholly inadequate location/building unless you meant for it to be attacked.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson