Posted on 05/15/2013 7:04:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
Several years ago, I was browsing the racks at Abercrombie & Fitch when a store employee approached me. “Hey, do you want to work here?” she asked, over the store’s notoriously loud (and obnoxious) music.
In case you didn’t know, no one applies to work at Abercrombie. They offer jobs to good-looking, stylish patrons. For a brief moment, I felt anointed.
I shouldn’t have. It turned out the store had dozens of teenaged and twenty-something employees—all of whom could expect to work five hours a week, if that. But there was a catch: in order to secure the job, you had to buy the clothes.
Nice try, Abercrombie. After realizing they were using employees as walking advertisements for the brand, I ditched the “job”—but only after spending more on the prerequisite clothes than I would’ve made there in a summer.
Considering their history of devious marketing ploys, I wasn’t surprised when I read about the latest Abercrombie kerfuffle. During an interview with Salon, CEO Mike Jeffries offered up this gem: “In every school there are the cool and popular kids, and then there are the not-so-cool kids…Candidly, we go after the cool kids. A lot of people don’t belong [in our clothes], and they can’t belong.”
Robin Lewis, author of The New Rules of Retail, said of Jeffries, “He doesn’t want larger people shopping in his store, he wants thin and beautiful people. He doesn’t want his core customers to see people who aren’t as hot as them wearing his clothing.”
Alright, serious question: have we had enough of Abercrombie yet?
Before using snobbery to sell clothes, they used sex. When I was in high school, Abercrombie published a quarterly porno magazine which featured models in various sexual poses—including, but not limited to, group sex. The magazine also ran articles by a ludicrous “sexpert” who encouraged readers to have group sex in motels and oral sex in movie theaters.
Talk about classy! What made it even more disturbing was the fact that Abercrombie caters to the under-18 crowd. (The magazine was later pulled due to public outrage.)
But it didn’t stop there. Around the same time, Abercrombie started selling thong underwear in its Abercrombie Kids stores. Girls as young as 8 could buy panties emblazoned with “eye candy” and “wink wink.” (I know: ew.) In 2005, a group of teens led a “girlcott” of Abercrombie when it started selling shirts that had the message “Who needs brains when you have these?” written across the chest.
Maybe “Lolita chic” doesn’t bother you. Well, what about racism? Abercrombie has come under fire for refusing to hire African-Americans and selling T-shirts that mocked Asian-Americans. They also discriminate against the disabled. An employee with a prosthetic arm sued the company in 2009, saying they forced her to work in the back room when they found out about her disability.
"I [was] bullied out of my job," the employee told The Guardian. "It was the lowest point I had ever been in my life."
Some readers will reply with “if you don’t like it, don’t shop there.” I don’t disagree. In fact, I support everyone’s right to browse Abercrombie’s racks in semi-darkness (being careful not to succumb to the noxious cologne) in order to buy an overpriced, paper-thin cotton shirt. But that doesn’t mean we can’t criticize it.
Since that day many years ago when I was offered a job at Abercrombie, I’ve become a parent. And it’s hard to find a retail company that embraces more of the values I don’t want to teach my daughter. If you have a problem with superficiality, or racism, or using porn to sell clothes, you cannot support this morally bankrupt company.
Don’t shop there.
I have not darkened their icky door in years after I complained about the blaring music and freezing cold and gross bags with naked icy metrosexual men, that place is awful
icy=icky, icky, icky,icky men
If the jeans or business style pants are not made by Wrangler or Cinch I don’t wear them. Pretty much same for the shirts except for my couple of high end suits and odd t-shirts.
Much like Victoria’s Secret, if parents didn’t buy this stuff it wouldn’t happen. This is not A&F’s fault. They are simply playing to the market that parents have provided. Fourteen and 15 year-olds do not drive themselves to these stores and use their own money to buy these clothes.
I won't. As far as I know, my whole state is the people they don't want wearing their clothes.
Not likely to shop there. I went from skinny jeans to comfort fit Dockers seemingly overnight.
The last time, I was in A&F was when they sold guns.
Is this the company whose CEO demands that the “flight attendants” on the company jet wear A&F underwear?
Much like Victoria’s Secret, if parents didn’t buy this stuff it wouldn’t happen.
Yep...
Well, after now insulting anyone who isn’t a size 0-2, I’m sure many of the more “rubenesque” middle aged moms who control the purse strings aren’t going to be allowing it much longer ....this CEO is a dope.
“The last time, I was in A&F was when they sold guns.”
Wow. I remember that too.
Thread is useless without pics of author.
Never been there. Do they sell Carhartts?
Not at all. Moms of every size will continue to live vicariously through their daughters and continue to patronize A&F. It’s about their daughters being popular, even if that means wearing very in modest clothing.
*Immodest
Ah, Pornography and Fitch.
No thanks.
I would say I wish that I am surprised, but I am not.
If “never went in there anyway” is a boycott, I’m in.
If a woman is a size 0, does she even exist?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.