Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chainmail

I see no compelling advantages for SP artillery.

Put me in the “Towed Artillery is lighter, cheaper, faster, and more durable” column.


20 posted on 05/14/2013 1:32:09 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
OK: picture the vast open areas of Iran or China. Then picture overwhelming masses of enemy armor on its way towards you and the rest of your unit. Imagine further that your towed artillery - relatively short ranged but firing rapidly - can't keep up with numbers of targets approaching.

Then imagine that you have 8 inch howitzers firing in GS reinforcing; 203 millimeters of pure, precise devastation and 200 pounds of America's best HE and forged steel to overlay your fires.

Nice, isn't it?

Now please don't tell me that we're back to towing 8 inch howitzers...

In that kind of combat environment, the King of Battle needs rapid-moving and rapid-firing SP artillery, not just light DS.

21 posted on 05/14/2013 3:01:11 PM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson