Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton never questioned in Benghazi probe: diplomat
Google ^ | 5/12/13 | AFP

Posted on 05/12/2013 8:42:56 PM PDT by Nachum

WASHINGTON — Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton was never questioned by investigators looking into the attack on the US mission in Libya that claimed the life of the US ambassador, a head of the internal probe said Sunday.

Ambassador Thomas Pickering said he and retired admiral Mike Mullen interviewed Clinton near the end of their investigation into the September 11 attack in Benghazi but saw no need to question her about her role.

He said they knew and understood what she had done "because we had questioned people who had attended meetings with her what went on at those meetings and how they were handled, what was relevant.

"I don't believe that it was necessary to do that. I don't think that there was anything there that we didn't know," Pickering said on CBS' "Face the Nation" talk show.

Pickering's defense of the probe came amid accusations by Republicans that the investigation by the "accountability review board" he and Mullen headed had left higher-ups off the hook, holding only lower level officials accountable for the security failings.

Eric Nordstrom, the regional security officer at the US embassy in Tripoli in the months before the Benghazi attack, testified at a Congressional hearing this week that senior State Department officials were aware of security shortcomings.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; bitchofbenghazi; clinton; dontaskdonttell; navyseals; never; questioned; threatmatrix

1 posted on 05/12/2013 8:42:57 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 05/12/2013 8:43:27 PM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

State investigates State, and doesn’t interview The Boss.

Very instructive: “If you’re really IMPORTANT, then the standards all others are held to don’t apply”.

Wasn’t there once a little thing called, Magna Carta, and stuff?


3 posted on 05/12/2013 8:52:35 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

9-11-12 Benghazi Massacre Coverup File: “Leave all men behind.”


4 posted on 05/12/2013 8:54:05 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Another teflon coated Clinton. Dirtbag.


5 posted on 05/12/2013 8:55:09 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Whistleblower: Hillary cut State’s counter-terrorism bureau out of Benghazi loop 05/06/2013 | Ed Morrissey

Blow-by-Blow: How Obama & Hillary Left Americans to Die

"Nordstrom further testified in writing that Hillary Clinton waived security requirements for the Benghazi consulate despite high and critical threat levels in the six categories of security standards established under the Overseas Security Policy Board and the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999. The waiver can only be authorized by the Secretary of State, who cannot delegate that responsibility to someone else. ”If the Secretary of State did not waive these requirements, who did so by ordering occupancy of the facilities in Benghazi and Tripoli?” Nordstrom wrote."

Why?

6 posted on 05/12/2013 8:55:20 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"I don't believe that it was necessary to do that. I don't think that there was anything there that we didn't know,"...simply absurd - you should want to know what went on in her head - admittedly probably not very much - during that time, and why she did what she did and made the decisions she did - you don't get that by talking to people who were in meetings with her - these people have so sold their souls and integrity for a bit of time in the spotlight - it's pathetic.....

And something else I heard just the other day and hadn't realized - even when Hillary did testify before the House, she was not under oath - no matter how much it can be shown she lied, she apparently won't have broken the law as far as perjury is concerned - as I said, it's pathetic.....

7 posted on 05/12/2013 8:55:33 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

Not under oath.

I have read that as well.


8 posted on 05/12/2013 8:57:53 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The truth is, all of the cowards in the government are scared to death of Slick Willie’s wife and Barry Benghazi. Hillary’s got her testicle lockbox back in action.


9 posted on 05/12/2013 8:59:07 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (If you think ObamaCare is a train wreck, wait until you see the amnesty bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; mickie
" 'I don't think there was anything there that we didn't know', Ambassador Pickering stated."

Pinch me, I think I fell into the rabbit hole and can't get up.

Leni

10 posted on 05/12/2013 9:02:04 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Would not be surprised if Obama/Clinton has something on Pickering and Mullen. Good way to control an “independent” investigation if its leaders are compromised. From the way this one was conducted, something is fishy. Do Democrat is coming out to use its “findings” as a shield to protect Obama or Clinton. Also would love to know what is happening between the Obama and Clinton camps. Bill has been invisible.


11 posted on 05/12/2013 9:03:40 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Why is Issa saying Hillary isn’t a target of the Benghazi probe?


12 posted on 05/12/2013 9:12:10 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

For legal and practical reasons.....Issa has to say that so the Dems can’t outright say that this is a witch hunt against Hillary even thought they are politically saying it is one against her. Hillary and Obama are clearly targets into the investigation


13 posted on 05/12/2013 10:17:27 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Peter King essentially answered the same earlier today on FOX. He said something about building blocks from the bottom up, IIRC.


14 posted on 05/12/2013 10:23:13 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
hillary wasn't relevant? Well I'll be darned.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

15 posted on 05/13/2013 12:18:11 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

yep, now to find the keys to the locks.


16 posted on 05/13/2013 12:28:58 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson