I don’t understand your point.
Do you believe that Obama committed a crime by either not ordering, or by ordering stopped, a military response to the events in Benghazi?
If you do, what crime do you believe he committed? Do you believe that crime could be proven in a court?
Look, he could be impeached, and he should be removed, simply for the IRS matter. By choosing to focus on his non-criminal and completely typical (for him) Benghazi inaction, don’t you think you make it LESS likely that he will be impeached?
If you're trying now to give him further cover by ignoring the ramifications of him sending Rice out to lie and in the process throw the Libyan ambassador under his little short bus, well, that won't work either. This is not a law enforcement issue, though you appear to be trying to divert it into such a discussion, proving yet again that you're trying to cover for little barry abstard boy. You are disgusting ... and frankly, transparent now. Your little demigod should be impeached and removed for the Benghazi episode, fast and furious, the IRS misuse, etc. Holder should be tried on accessory to murder charges, and ... well, I think you get the ghist of it now, even as you try to play misdirection.
If no action was taken by the CIC for personal political reasons then the charge would be dereliction of duty.
"Dereliction of duty is a specific offense under United States Code Title 10,892. Article 92 and applies to all branches of the US military. A service member who is derelict has willfully refused to perform his duties"