Replies

Yes. it scares me——because I have studied history.

Machiavelli stated that the promotion of Virtue is essential for any military (or police force). That said-—what does zero do? Promote Sodomy-—why? To chase out Christians (people with ethics)-—make them “bigots” and “haters” and force them out along, with the clergy, when they are forced to “marry” sodomites. Muslims are sodomites-—like Shoebat stated on Michael Savage program-—the Saudis prefer little boys.

People who practice Vice are not moral-—they dehumanize themselves and others and with the habituation, it desensitizes one to “hurting” others-—because of the habitual degradation of yourself and others. Homosexuals were the most brutal armies-—whether the Samurai, Spartans, Bolsheviks and Brownshirts and all serial killers were sexual perverts. They had no trouble brutally killing anyone—women and children and old people.

Christian Ethics is the only religion which elevated women (because of Mary) and which created “chivalry”. The “Romantic” period really didn’t translate in Asian countries because of the status of women and the rampant homosexuality/pederasty in ME and Asia. Christian Ethics removed homosexuality/pederasty from Western Civ-—as a “Good” anyhow—but they are reversing it. They are making Sodomy “Good” again-—to destroy Christian Ethics in the West. They make kids take “Pride” in those who sodomize others——is normalizing it...... bringing us back to the Pagan/Occult cultures. Without Christianity-—we will collapse into paganism, occultism where there are no “individual” rights or respect for the individual.....that concept was entirely a Christian one.

Christian Ethics is the only religion which elevated women (because of Mary) and which created “chivalry”.

Allow me to offend: screw Mary.
Christianity doesn't honor women because of some venerated-as-a-goddess woman; Christianity honors women as equals because [in Matt 19] Jesus said “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female.” -- this is extremely significant, as he is referencing the creation story, wherein woman and man both are made in the image of God.

Indeed, in the story of creation man is created first, not as a show of superiority, but as an object-lesson for the authority that man was given: he was told to name the animals (and look for a helpmeet) but none of the animals was suitable.

Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the air and all the beasts of the field. But for Adam no suitable helper was found. ... And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. Then the man said, “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.”

Why is this significant? because the man was literally being shown that there is nothing like man in all of the creatures of Earth; none of them were suitable to share his life with -- this is why God did not create them at once: to drive home the point that mankind is supremely different from all other life on Earth. Once God showed him that, He brought woman out of his own flesh -- literally of the same stuff as he: thus to deny woman is made in God's image is to deny that man is made in Gods image, and likewise to deny man is made in God's image is to deny woman is made in God's image.

This is the thing that Feminists simply cannot stand: they do not want equality, they want superiority. They view any authority wielded by man over woman as "patriarchy" -- which utterly ignores that in ANY group there are leaders. (In a herd of female cows for instance, there is a "Bossy" which lives up to her name... that God made a rule that husbands should be the authority is nothing more [or less] than proscribing an orderly society.)