[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

fyi

[Da Coyote]

Cannot be, cannot be.

The WaPo calls the testimony a “yarn”.

And everyone knows, when a journalism major (what we science types call someone getting an ‘F’ in elementary math) writes something, it MUST be true.

[Safrguns]

Where are the calls to re-summon Hillary Clinton to the stand to get names and answers for her lies?

[Grampa Dave]

— Then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jan. 23, 2013:

“I wasn’t involved in the talking points process.... As I understand it, as I’ve been told, it was a typical interagency process where staff, including from the State Department, all participated, to try to come up with whatever was going to be made publicly available, and it was an intelligence product.”

“With all due respect,the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”—Hillary Clinton

[urbanpovertylawcenter]

Where was Hicks last fall when his testimony could have “made a difference”!

I fear the conspiracy runs deeper than anyone suspects.

[kevkrom]

There was little "new" here, in that most of it had been rumored or suspected, but now it's officially on the record. But there were a few eyebrow-raisers, even still.

I, for one, was surprised to learn that Amb. Rice knew it was a terrorist attack no later than 9/12, well before peddling the "video" nonsense on TV. I had always assumed she was the one stuck with the talking points precisely because she knew nothing, but would stick to the script. Turns out she was knowingly lying the whole time.

[Texas Fossil]

Thanks for the post.

Closer to reality than most of the MSM coverage.

[I want the USA back]

It’s very possible the clown will get away with his crime. Half the country has its head up their a$$es, and the media are pushing it in farther.

[luvbach1]

But what about the supposed coverup of the purported secret purpose of the consulate to coordinate shipment of arms to Syrian rebels? Nobody on the committee even asked a question about it while I watched most of the hearing. Not saying I have any knowledge of that “secret purpose” other than the rumors I’ve read.

[Gator113]

Gregory Hicks, Eric Nordstrom, and Mark Thompson are much more than “whistleblowers”, they are very competent and credible witnesses that have testified under oath.... they are also PATRIOTS.

[freekitty]

I wonder if the all of the libtards realize, not just some of the librards realize; if Hillary and Obama will do what they did to those 4 men; they will do it to them? Get the trains ready, the libtards are going with the rest of us. They may believe they aren’t with some sweet cushy lives and others freebies; but to people if you can call them that; don’t care. You are just another number.

[The Great RJ]

Anyone who listened to that testimony and wasn’t a rabid Democrat partisan would know the US government lied about what happened for political expediency and those lies were concocted by the White House. The testimony also revealed that the State Department had made no real plans for increased security and ignored warnings from their own staff about the danger in the region. The big unanswered question was what was the Ambassador doing in Benghazi especially when it was known to be a hot bed for terrorists and the compound was not very secure. Was the Ambassador supervising the transfer of Libyan arms to Syrian rebels in a covert operation???