[Grampa Dave]

— Then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jan. 23, 2013:

“I wasn’t involved in the talking points process.... As I understand it, as I’ve been told, it was a typical interagency process where staff, including from the State Department, all participated, to try to come up with whatever was going to be made publicly available, and it was an intelligence product.”

“With all due respect,the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”—Hillary Clinton

[urbanpovertylawcenter]

She looks mentally impaired.

She is slipping fast.

When can Chelsea run? At 35?

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Thanks,....Got another video:

Rubio On Benghazi Talking Points: Someone In Admin. Should Have Said "This Is Wrong"

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) discusses the House hearing on the Benghazi attack on "FOX & Friends."

“They didn’t want to admit that it was a terrorist attack because to admit it was a terrorist attack was to admit that terrorism was still out there and reaching us. And so that’s the reason why they sent the order in my opinion. In some way, shape or form, they sent the order that these talking points should not be allowed to include any reference to terrorism per say or at least it acting as a terrorist attack, but rather they need to be told that this was something that was a result of a YouTube video. So, I think that was the political motivation behind it. What I think is sad is how many people are around the administration, including the former Secretary of State, Secretary Clinton, knew this to be the case and allowed this to move forward anyway. You would have hoped the people would have stood up and said this is wrong, the American people deserve the truth. That didn’t happen.”