Comment #43, this thread:
“Good thing that there were a lot of people in that neighborhood on welfare and unemployment otherwise there might not have been anyone there to hear her screams. “
Ramsey has a job, said he was home because he had the day off.
I simply don’t understand why you have decided this is a partisan issue. From the beginning, from Monday night, it’s been apparent that there were two men who helped the girl, one hispanic, one a black man, neither of them known for social standing or a big bank account.
Can’t you just pat them both on the back?
What is untrue about that statement??? and where in that statement is the finger pointed at Charles Ramsay???
Ramsey has a job, said he was home because he had the day off.
I'll guarantee you that is a part time job, and even if it is not he can't make ends meet on what they pay dishwashers -- $7/hr. His income/housing is being supplemented somewhere and I have no problem with that as he no doubt needs it as part of the working poor.
But you decided to make an issue out of this by trying to read motives that aren't there and making a false accusation. All I did was point out the parts of the article that elucidated what happened that day. And you accuse me of being "partisan"??? Partisan of what???
I simply pointed out that if Charles is a hero, then Angel is more of a hero as he led the charge across the street to help and Charles by his own admission merely followed.
Why are you incapable of giving credit where credit is due -- to Angel???