What is untrue about that statement??? and where in that statement is the finger pointed at Charles Ramsay???
Ramsey has a job, said he was home because he had the day off.
I'll guarantee you that is a part time job, and even if it is not he can't make ends meet on what they pay dishwashers -- $7/hr. His income/housing is being supplemented somewhere and I have no problem with that as he no doubt needs it as part of the working poor.
But you decided to make an issue out of this by trying to read motives that aren't there and making a false accusation. All I did was point out the parts of the article that elucidated what happened that day. And you accuse me of being "partisan"??? Partisan of what???
I simply pointed out that if Charles is a hero, then Angel is more of a hero as he led the charge across the street to help and Charles by his own admission merely followed.
Why are you incapable of giving credit where credit is due -- to Angel???
Again, unless you’re an eyewitness, you are gathering information from the same sources as all the rest of us.
Since you earlier linked to The Daily Mail, read this:
“Cordero said he and other neighbors helped Ramsey break down the door of the Seymore Ave. home.”
Cordero doesn’t speak English. Here’s a quote by Cordero from the first Daily Mail article to which you linked:
“We saw a hand outside the house that was moving up and down so we went to go check what was going on and she had told me that she had been kidnapped for ten years.”
We? That’s plural. Not just Cordero.
And how did he understand what she said if she speaks English and he only speaks Spanish and needs an interpreter?
Amanda and her co-victims were helped by neighbors. Plural. Apparently both men, then the lady across the street with the phone. It’s not either/or neither/nor. They all agree on that. I don’t understand why you can’t.