To: Nachum
Hmm. I’m wondering if she has a transcript that contradicts his testimony?
4 posted on
05/08/2013 12:14:27 PM PDT by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: saganite
Hmm. I’m wondering if she has a transcript that contradicts his testimony? She conveniently couldn't find it. They even asked for the page she was citing and she didn't have it.
6 posted on
05/08/2013 12:25:36 PM PDT by
Nachum
(The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
To: saganite
You should be aware that it is a routine tactic of certain shysters to "read back" a false version of a witness's testimony in an attempt to create a contradiction that can then be used to impeach credibility. Yes of course it's dishonest and unethical but so what. We're talking lawyers here.
To: saganite
She had a staff-prepared line of questioning that was predicated on making “a definition of what the meaning of ‘is’ is.”
It is all they have. Dude says his bosses told him “we want to be in on anything you say, and we want final say-so”.....
Diversionist bullshit of which much liberal no-viewer cable shows will make great hay.
10 posted on
05/08/2013 12:48:05 PM PDT by
Gaffer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson