Posted on 05/07/2013 4:20:45 PM PDT by Kaslin
img src=http://media.townhall.com/townhall/reu/ha/2013/107/c7b1cfae-761d-43ed-b714-66d6e385454a.jpg>
Obamacare was supposed to be a big success by now, according to predictions made by liberals who railroaded it through Congress in 2010. Instead, as admitted by one of its leading architects, Democratic Sen. Max Baucus, it's heading for a "train wreck" later this year.
Baucus' apt metaphor is being echoed by other Democrats because it is so obviously true. Harry Reid said, "I agree with him." Sen. Jay Rockefeller described it as "so complicated" that it's "beyond comprehension." Henry Chao, the government's chief technical officer in charge of implementing the exchanges, said, "Let's just make sure it's not a Third World experience."
The outcry over the length of the 21-page application form (with a 61-page instruction manual) resulted in a cosmetic shortening. The same nosy questions are now asked on three separate forms (of three, five and 12 pages), plus three appendices, plus a requirement that families with more than one child "make a copy of pages 4 and 5 and complete" them for each additional child.
Most states have repudiated key aspects of this misguided law, with the result that our nation is divided between about 16 "Obamacare states" and 34 states that respect individual liberty. Every state in the South, from Virginia to Texas, has rejected a central part of Obamacare by declining to increase its Medicaid rolls, despite the promise of massive federal handouts.
The official name of Obamacare is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, but this law is turning out to be neither protective of patients nor affordable. The American public was promised that we could keep our insurance and physicians, but in fact, many millions will lose their health insurance and access to their own physicians.
Several Republican governors caved in to pressure by the media and the hospital industry to embrace the costly Medicaid expansion, but then they were embarrassed by their own Republican state legislatures, which rejected this boondoggle. Medicaid spends billions on administrative costs and only a small percentage on quality medical care, so this inefficient program should be trimmed, not expanded.
Obamacare is causing reductions in hours worked and paychecks for many Americans as businesses seek to reduce their Obamacare penalties by decreasing the number of employees who work 30 hours or more a week. Companies having at least 50 full-time employees must purchase expensive health insurance or else pay $2,000 or more in fines for each employee who works at least 30 hours a week.
Many businesses have decided to pay these fines rather than buy costly insurance for services, such as abortion-inducing drugs, that they do not even want. Government-approved health insurance policies will not cover many of the services that people can buy now with their own Health Savings Accounts.
Obamacare's much-publicized health insurance exchanges, supposedly designed to make insurance more affordable, have been a bust. Two-thirds of the states have declined to set up exchanges, and taxpayer costs for them have ballooned to $5.7 billion for the federal government to establish them.
It seems doubtful that the Obama administration will comply with Obamacare by the date it is scheduled to become fully effective: Jan. 1, 2014. At a news conference last week, President Obama failed to reassure us by making this clueless comment, "Anytime you're implementing something big, there's going to be people who are nervous and anxious about 'is it going to get done' until it's actually done."
Headlines proclaim the stock market's new record highs, but the average American paycheck and fringe benefits are lagging far behind due to Obamacare. Obamacare is causing retail stores to reduce hours (and paychecks) for their employees at the fastest rate in more than 30 years in order to avoid Obamacare penalties.
While politicians brag that employment has increased by 1 percent over the past year in retail, the total hours worked has actually fallen by 0.9 percent during that same period. Employee fringe benefits in the service sector fell sharply in the first quarter for the first time in more than a decade.
A significant portion of the increase in overall employment is in temporary workers who are increasingly used by businesses to reduce Obamacare's penalties. Obamacare is causing a shift in private employment to less desirable temporary jobs and jobs of shorter hours.
Many young people who voted for Obama are in for a surprise when they realize how much Obamacare will cost them. College students in New Jersey face an increase in insurance costs from a few hundred dollars annually to $1,700 or more, so Democrats have rushed to repeal a New Jersey law that requires college students to buy health insurance.
A narrow vote in the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Obamacare last summer by calling it a tax, even though Americans repeatedly were told by Democrats that it was not a tax. As bad as new taxes are, this Obamacare train wreck is even worse than a tax.
We’ll have to wreck it to see how it runs.
Good...let’s hope the train wreck is so bad that the Dems lose the Senate.
Then just not implement it anymore and defund it! how stupid is DC? Forget the rhetoric and do some action. Action speaks louder than words.
It’s a monkey-wrench meeting gears.
By design.
Oh, foolish young Grasshopper! No, they're already tuning up the Golden Pipes for another chorus of "Single Payer! Single Payer! Single Payer!"
Obama doesn't want ObamaCare, neither does Dirty Harry. They want Single Payer, a.k.a. Sovietcare.
"Health care is the keystone of the arch of Soviet power." -- V.I. Lenin
Now if only the spineless Republicans can be prevented from voting for stopgap measures to “fix” the problems.
Agreed! And The Nation shall say “That’s another fine mess you’ve got us into.”
GOPholes only produce Sh!t.
It was a “train wreck” from day one
I had occasion yesterday to speak on the phone with a lady I do not know but she said she works in health insurance and neither she nor any of her associates, some of whom she described as “experts with thirty years in health care insurance” can begin to decipher the meaning of the gobbledygook they are supposed to comply with. The way she described it sounds as though it has to collapse simply because no one can know whether they are doing the right thing or not.
And in Michigan the state legislature overrode the governor and refused to pass a law that would've taken that federal money for the states medicare. The gov. was upset, the Dems howled... It was really fun to watch.
CC
Even though the participation rate was notably far less than expected, the costs for those that did join were notably higher then they ever expected, per person.
There's no such thing as a free lunch.
Same as ( )o( )bama.
Bam heard this term “train wreck” recently and decided that it was time to hire a `Station Master’ Czar.
This job would be to “facilitate, implement, communicate and coordinate” between the couple-dozen senior executive, six-figure-salary healthcare department heads created over the last four years already on board.
In so many words, s/he/it would `prep & polish’ information provided to the press secretary to ensure that it was appropriate for public consumption.
Of course s/he/it would have to be a team-player, so they decided to interview academics from the University of Chicago—in other words, old acquaintenances of the president.
They located one candidate who looked like a winner: female, a professor of Wymen Studies (a rather severe lesbian) and Democrat, of course, and called her in for an interview.
Unfortunately, she didn’t have much `real world’ practical experience, but she made up for it with rabid enthusiasm and expressions of unqualified loyalty.
So, they posed their final question to her: “In the highly unlikely event that a member of the media asked the question, in some form or another, of Mr. Carney:
“Has the president’s Affordable Care Act become a `train wreck’?”
After careful consideration she said that, in the highly unlikely event this question was raised, she would have advised the press secretary to reply that he would call his brother.
“Why would you have the press secretary tell the press that he would call his brother”? the interviewer asked, clearly mystified.
“Because the press secretary would say next,” she replied, “when queried by the press: ``Cause my brother ain’t never seen no train wreck!’ And they would all have a good laugh, thinking to themselves how silly they had been to question the president and move on to more important issues, like gun control, gay rights and immigration reform.”
So they hired her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
