1 posted on
05/07/2013 4:18:42 PM PDT by
SJackson
To: SJackson
“if” is not the question ....
2 posted on
05/07/2013 4:20:57 PM PDT by
clamper1797
(De-throne King Obozo)
To: SJackson
What if al Qaeda Gets Syrian Chemical Weapons?
***It depends. If Al Qaeda uses them during the Obama administration, the MSM will cover for him and it won’t mean anything. If they use it in the next administration (which is likely to be republican) then the MSM will clamor for the heads of such inneffectual anti-terrorists on a ‘conservative’ administration.
4 posted on
05/07/2013 4:22:58 PM PDT by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
To: SJackson
5 posted on
05/07/2013 4:24:14 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Then they'll make plans to use them. I'm not worried, my Uncle Joe assured me they're dead, GM is alive.
6 posted on
05/07/2013 4:27:34 PM PDT by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
To: SJackson
What if Al Qaeda received anti-aircraft missiles from Stevens in Benghazi? That would explain waaaaaay too much.
7 posted on
05/07/2013 4:32:07 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(All observant Muslims want to kill you. If they don't, they are not really Muslims.)
What if al Qaeda Gets Syrian Chemical Weapons? Basher Asshead, Alkida.....WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
8 posted on
05/07/2013 4:38:35 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Hey RATs! Control your murdering freaks.)
To: SJackson
Time magazine is pondering this serious question?
Usually they’re marveling that there is a difference between men and women FROM BIRTH:
They really did marvel at that. Why can’t they just die and go away?
12 posted on
05/07/2013 4:56:42 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: SJackson
In reality chemical weapons are not a hell of a lot different from “conventional” One is just as dead if one is blown up by a 1000 # bomb as if one is nailed with Sarin. Using such things in Syria by either side will not materially affect the war, won’t give the user’s side any advantage over the other.
13 posted on
05/07/2013 5:13:35 PM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
To: SJackson
Bashar al-Assad, might have used nerve gas against his own people Nerve gas?
Why, thats just agricultural pesticide.
14 posted on
05/07/2013 5:14:32 PM PDT by
marron
To: SJackson
Better question..what if Obama let AQ have chemical weapons in Benghazi?
15 posted on
05/07/2013 5:25:05 PM PDT by
penelopesire
(TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
To: SJackson
Israel would retaliate the US will not.
They will be used in the Blue Cities.
New York City, Boston,Chicago.
16 posted on
05/07/2013 5:34:00 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(None here can be puzzled by why Jews walked into the cars so quietly- we are walking up the planks.)
To: SJackson
What if al Qaeda Gets Syrian Chemical Weapons? As a good capitalist, I will buy stock in gas mask manufacturers. Their sales will boom.
17 posted on
05/07/2013 5:56:41 PM PDT by
AmusedBystander
(The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
To: SJackson
Why would we assume Assad has chemical weapons? After all It is documented Saddam Hussein used such weapons on his people; yet Bush lied and people died. /sarc
18 posted on
05/07/2013 5:57:12 PM PDT by
Idaho_Cowboy
(Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
To: SJackson
No major city in the US will be safe from a potential chemical attack . The open southern border guarantees it.
To: SJackson
What Weapons? WMD... Naw Syria doesn’t have any. Stop pulling the wool over our eyes. Saddam didn’t have them either....Just keep repeating that over and over and over again. There is nothing to see or find when you have blinders over your eyes....
20 posted on
05/07/2013 6:20:29 PM PDT by
ncfool
(Obama's aMeriKa 2012 can we make it until 2016?)
To: SJackson
We’ll know if they do. They’ll bring them across the intentionally, criminally porous southern border and use them here. On us. If/when that happens I want to see some people in DC put in front of a firing squad. Tens of thousands of illegals cross that border every year. Tons of illegal drugs cross it every year. You think a determined enemy couldn’t get a couple dozen people and a few hundred pounds of chemical weapons across? Ha.
21 posted on
05/07/2013 6:23:20 PM PDT by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: SJackson
” What if al Qaeda Gets Syrian Chemical Weapons?”
No problem. We can absorb a terrorist attack — BH Obama.
23 posted on
05/07/2013 8:17:05 PM PDT by
garjog
(Heroes Died. Obama Lied.)
To: SJackson
Sorry, you folks at TIME magazine. The AQ terrorists already have chemical weapons thanks to Barry Obama’s Benghazi gun running program. The CIA funneled 40,000 tons of weapons and ammo to the anti-Assad NSA through Turkey as intermediary. Part of those weapons included chemical weapons and delivery systems. Then CIA and contractors showed the NSA how to arm and deploy those chemical systems.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson