Skip to comments.
SC 1st District Special Election (Live Thread)
me ^
| 7 May 2013
| me
Posted on 05/07/2013 11:54:51 AM PDT by vikingd00d
No live thread yet, so I'm starting one.
Voted at 2:30 p.m. in Mt Pleasant 19. No line. Poll worker reported 28.3% turnout so far in a precinct that had a 66% turnout in the last major election.
Results should be here after the polls close.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 113th; busch; colbert; colbertbusch; elizabethbusch; marksanford; sanford; sc2013; southcarolina; stephencolbert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
To: vikingd00d
27s
Mark Sanford (R) leads Elizabeth Colbert Busch (D) 54.0%-45.5% with 71% reporting #SC1
41
posted on
05/07/2013 5:29:47 PM PDT
by
wolficatZ
(Hey blue states....Got Food?)
To: manc
† Chris †@yourweekleydosenow “@Live5News: AP: Mark Sanford, GOP, elected U.S. House, District 1, South Carolina.#SC1 #chsnews”
Phillip M. Bailey@phillipmbaileynow Right now @CNN projects Mark Sanford will win South Carolina House seat http://wp.me/p4HKM-1aRu #SC1
42
posted on
05/07/2013 5:32:16 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: vikingd00d
Can someone explain why Bush is listed twice under two different parties? Is this common in SC? I know NY has something like this with the Conservative and Liberal parties...but what’s this all about?
Hank
To: muawiyah; apillar; House Atreides; Viennacon; JLAGRAYFOX; AuH2ORepublican; mrsmith; clintonh8r; ...
AP declares Sanford the winner.
44
posted on
05/07/2013 5:41:20 PM PDT
by
vikingd00d
(chown -R us ./base)
To: mrsmith
Yeh!! liberal heads must be exploding about now..love it!!
45
posted on
05/07/2013 5:42:57 PM PDT
by
rainee
(Her)
To: rainee
Dick Harpootlian should take this opportunity to blow his brains out. Buh-bye, DICK
46
posted on
05/07/2013 5:44:45 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
("Europe was created by history. America was created by a philosophy." Baroness Thatcher)
To: County Agent Hank Kimball
Can someone explain why Bush is listed twice under two different parties? Your answer is here.
47
posted on
05/07/2013 5:46:39 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
To: clintonh8r
Ha! his complete meltdown will just be icing on the cake.
48
posted on
05/07/2013 5:48:27 PM PDT
by
rainee
(Her)
To: rainee
Anyone having links of liberals melting down...please post.
It will be like a little treat before tomorrow.
Hopefully the Seal Team Six presser on Thursday will make it even worse for Obama.
Someone who cares about America should be in charge of America.
49
posted on
05/07/2013 5:51:32 PM PDT
by
struggle
To: upchuck
Working Families Party... A Communist front, no?
50
posted on
05/07/2013 5:57:31 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: vikingd00d
51
posted on
05/07/2013 5:59:21 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: mrsmith
oh please, please please say it is true
52
posted on
05/07/2013 6:15:39 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: vikingd00d
yyyeeesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
helps to stop the socialists and Obama’s agenda
53
posted on
05/07/2013 6:16:44 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: struggle
Needs to be repeated often and loudly:
Someone who cares about America should be in charge of America.
I only wish the press believed it and political class swore to it! oh wait ...
54
posted on
05/07/2013 6:20:29 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: MHGinTN
there is a press, I thought there was a group which did sit there near lunch time but it was a cover up group .
Even the low info voters out there and there are millions had just heard a slight truth then Obama would never have won years ago let alone this last election.
55
posted on
05/07/2013 6:56:31 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: wolficatZ
Very interesting info on SC-1... thanks!
56
posted on
05/09/2013 2:19:11 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Rest in Peace, FReeper Extraordinaire Doctor Raoul...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
