That same reasoning applies to homemade machine guns (see the Stewart case above) and to guns made and sold in Kansas. It's a package deal.
But that doesnt make sense to me either, because selling drugs is illegal regardless of where the drugs were produced. Right?
They use the commerce clause to justify forbidding the sale of it but its illegal to sell it even if state lines arent crossed. Right?
Not in CO and WA, or in states with medical marijuana. Let me ask this. Do you support the authority of CO and WA to run their marijuana policies without fedgov overruling them?
I don’t know what Constitutional authority the feds would have, to regulate commerce that happens strictly within a state’s own borders.
To be truthful, like I said before, I’m having trouble figuring out what Constitutional authority Congress has for most of the laws they make. What is the basis for federal criminal law, for instance?
I think I need to read the Constitution from front to back again. What are Congress’ enumerated powers?