Posted on 05/03/2013 1:21:34 PM PDT by Kaslin
A wit, surveying Washington's monuments, once diagnosed the nation's capital as suffering an "edifice complex." The city's vast array of monumental buildings, housing the three branches of government, honoring the founders and heroes of the republic, and housing extraordinary temples of fine art, science, technology and history, could give an overwhelmed visitor that impression.
This week, Bill Clinton remarked how those buildings hold special meaning for visitors from around the world, celebrating the grandest accomplishments of man, and how one stands out as the nation's "conscience."
The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum celebrates its 20th anniversary this week. Not everyone thought at the time that building a Holocaust Museum so close to the national mall was a good idea, but it has welcomed more than 34 million visitors since, testifying to a universally humbling recognition of a dark piece of human history and presenting a daunting challenge to the world in the phrase "never again."
In a moving ceremony in the company of a thousand survivors of the Holocaust, the former president focused on the memorial museum's relevance to our present day. Although 99.5 percent of the human DNA links every human to the others with virtually identical genes, the former president observed that the masses tend to dwell on the half of 1 percent of separation "that makes us vulnerable to the fever, the sickness that the Nazis gave to the Germans." It is that virus which we can see taking form today in our interdependent world "that is the biggest threat to our children and grandchildren."
The former president's words sound all the more menacing to anyone watching a YouTube video recorded from Iqra TV in Saudi Arabia. In it, a bright-eyed, plump-cheeked 3-and-a-half-year-old girl in a white hijab is carefully programmed to answer a female interviewer's questions:
"Are you a Muslim? " the interviewer asks.
"Yes," the little girl replies.
"Do you know the Jews?"
"Yes."
"Do you like them?"
"No."
"Why don't you like them?"
"Because they are apes and pigs."
"Who said that about them?"
"Allah."
"Where did he say it?"
"The Quran."
This is not an unusual video; others similar to it are found scattered on television networks throughout the Middle East and are well-documented by Neil J. Kressel, director of the honors program in the social sciences at William Patterson University in New Jersey. He focuses chilling attention on them in his new book, "The Sons of Pigs and Apes." Kressel is concerned that many in the West refuse to look at the way anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism have become synonymous.
His fears are echoed in Commentary magazine, which takes to task journalists and academics in the West who conceal Jew-hatred or act as though it doesn't exist.
When Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi described Zionists who return Palestinian fire as "bloodsuckers ... descendants of ape and pigs," The New York Times dismissed the remark as unimportant, that it was spoken when the Egyptians were beset with grief after a conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.
The Times account erred, given the actual dates; it was an outrageous excuse in any event. Many journalists and academics similarly excuse Muslim hatred of Jews as based on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, when much closer to the truth is a remark by a prominent Egyptian cleric that Jews "aren't our enemies because they occupy Palestine, they would be our enemies even if they had not occupied anything."
Eli Wiesel, the founding chairman of the museum, calls the Holocaust a "black hole" in the collective memory. Silence easily becomes a tool of the tormentor. Silence has many guises -- in omission, on blank pages, in empty spaces between words. Only 13 years ago, museum researchers crunching the numbers in the carefully preserved arithmetic of "the final solution" were astonished to discover the staggering number of ghettos, slave labor sites, concentration camps and killing factories the Nazis spread throughout Europe. Asks Wiesel, "Why was there no public outcry of indignation and outrage?"
"The Diary of Anne Frank" was the first major book to give the Holocaust its agonized human face. In the novel "Ghost Writer," Philip Roth imagines that Anne didn't die, but decided to keep her existence a secret. Alive, she was merely another teenager with a diary; dead, she assumed the power to teach a moral lesson. What exactly that lesson is remains a matter of dispute.
When the Holocaust Memorial Museum was opened two decades ago, on a bright spring day with the cherry blossoms in bloom nearby to mark the beginning of a glorious Washington spring, Eli Wiesel spoke of his vision, engraved in stone at the entrance to the edifice: "For the dead and the living, we must bear witness." Would we, if called on, have the will to do more?
“God, Israel, and the Torah are One.” Take a Jew from Torah, and his potential for evil is just that much greater, as we see abundantly in examples like Schumer.
You’re absolutely right.
American secular Jews are not really Jews.
“Why don’t you explain the obvious to me, then?”
I would be happy to refer you to several great books on the subject. That way, you can educate yourself.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Great post! Of course, during the Nazi era, the radical Islamists of the time were friendly with the Third Reich.
I can assure you that if you detest Schmuckie Chuckie Schumer, that in and of itself does not make you an anti-Semite or a Nazi.
I don't know why you would bring his name up in a thread about Holocaust museums and memorials.
“American secular Jews are not really Jews.”
No, they are Jewish. They are just heretical and missing a part of themselves.
I hate Chuck Shumer, too.
I also hate cancer, Chrysler K Cars, ObamaCare, and being sick at my stomach.
None of that, however, has a thing to do with this thread.
Thank you. I appreciate your clarification.
:)
I realize that the detestation of Chuckie has nothing to do with this article; however, it was just a spot to deposit a rant against a supercilious asshat.
Well, I understand your intent.
I will say, from the outside, bringing up a foul person who happens to be Jewish in a discussion about hatred of Jewish people looks a lot like hatred of Jewish people.
Now, again, I know that was not what you meant, but that is what it looks like in vaccuum.
All agree that Chuckie, who is probably agnostic, is a poor example of anything. Rather like the grinning ape from Vermont, Patrick Leahy who loves his government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.