Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High school track team disqualified for making religious gesture
KRIV TV ^ | 5/2/2013 | Damali Keith

Posted on 05/03/2013 2:14:35 AM PDT by markomalley

Some people are outraged after a high school track team is disqualified from competing in state finals because one runner made a religious gesture. In just a few seconds the boys Columbus High School 4 X 100 relay team went from winning the regional meet, heading to state championships to having it all stripped away. How did the "W" so quickly become "DQ"? Well. when the anchor of the relay team crossed the finish line, he won the race, raised his finger to the sky and that gesture caused the winning regional's relay team to be disqualified.

"It's a sad deal. I think it's a travesty. Those kids work hard," says K.C. Hayes. Hayes' son Derrick Hayes is the runner who won the race then pointed to God, turning a once in a lifetime opportunity into a huge heartbreak that will likely last his lifetime. "As a team they reached their goal and in an instant it was just gone, over something we think is a non-issue. I guess someone else thinks it is an issue. He just said dad I was pointing at the heavens" says K.C. Hayes.

A judge with the University Interscholastic League or UIL, which enforces the rules for high school athletics, was there at the meet in Kingsville and made the call to disqualify the four member relay team. "For those kids the work they put in, what are we teaching them? Ok you're going to sacrifice, work hard and do everything it takes and ok it's just ripped away," says Hayes.

"It's a harsh consequence for what some people may deem a small gesture. The rule states no celebratory gestures including raising your arms," explains Columbus I.S.D. Superintendent Robert O'Connor. According to the UIL the relay team was disqualified for "unsporting conduct". The UIL also points out, it does not have a rule prohibiting religious expression. "You can do whatever you want to in terms of prayer, kneeling or whatever you want to once you get out of the competition area. You just can't do it in the competition area. It goes back to the taunting rule. I can't taunt my opponent," O'Connor explains.

"It's not a malicious act. It's not a taunting act. It's a 'we did it' and he (my son) knows where the source comes from. I know him. He's not a malicious kid. On the football field he'll hit you and then help you up," Hayes says.

"It's heartbreaking," says O'Connor. Superintendent O'Connor says since Saturday's track meet and the disqualification he has received a number of nasty emails. One read 'Dear sir, you, are an idiot'. O'Connor wants to stress this is not his decision. This is coming from the UIL. In fact, the district protested the disqualification but the UIL is not changing the decision.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: Truth2012

Had he given the one finger salute to God all would be okay.


81 posted on 05/03/2013 6:20:20 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
FWIW smiling is a “celebratory gesture.” Did they disqualify every winner who smiled? Or just the ones who appeared to be recognizing the source of their God given abilities?

Exactly.

82 posted on 05/03/2013 6:26:07 AM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

All sports rules should require the winners to apologize profusely to the losers. We don’t want them to feel bad about themselves. In fact, why keep score or time at all? Let everyone win and collect trophies!


83 posted on 05/03/2013 6:26:33 AM PDT by barefoot_hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

All he had to do was trot off the track and he could have done back flips. People especially the young must learn self control.


84 posted on 05/03/2013 6:28:47 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

“Rules are rules” is one of the most ignorant things I have seen on FR in a long time. That attitude leads right to the “showers”.


85 posted on 05/03/2013 6:47:39 AM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“For those kids the work they put in, what are we teaching them? Ok you’re going to sacrifice, work hard and do everything it takes and ok it’s just ripped away,”

It’s a good thing that they learned this lesson young. It is the way of the new Amerika. The hard workers, the diligent, the savers, the planners and the most productive are to be demonized and must have their wealth redistributed. It is all about “fairness” now.


86 posted on 05/03/2013 6:58:09 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ogen hal

Amen.


87 posted on 05/03/2013 7:00:47 AM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111

You seem to have picked up on their strategy:

“There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted and you create a nation of law-breakers — and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system.”

Quote by: Ayn Rand
(1905-1982) Author
Source: “Atlas Shrugged”, Part II, Chapter 3


88 posted on 05/03/2013 7:01:36 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441

I know about bans on “celebratory gestures” such as when scoring a touchdown for example. But just holding up a finger? Really, where do you draw the line? And it was specifically referred to as a “religious gesture”, not a celebratory one.


89 posted on 05/03/2013 7:02:37 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

The rule says arms, from what I read he raised one arm.


90 posted on 05/03/2013 7:05:37 AM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Yes, clearly ol' Timmy here is using the exact same gesture that you posted and is taunting his opponents.

You were a chaplain, eh? Huh.


91 posted on 05/03/2013 7:16:49 AM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: stormhill
Is it possible the public really condones this?

Unfortunately, yes.

92 posted on 05/03/2013 7:38:38 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ogen hal

Okay, lets have no rules we don’t like!


93 posted on 05/03/2013 7:41:35 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Here's the comment from a typical leftist about the report in the news:
The father even admits that it was a "we did it" gesture. The fact that his ignorant son thinks his imaginary friend wants him to win a race more than to feed starving people around the world is another matter entirely.
Anyone who doubts this is about contempt for religion should read those comments.
94 posted on 05/03/2013 7:45:42 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Sorry, we disagree, I guess. My feelings aren’t all that strong, but as soon as you start allowing “discretion” in what is too much, problems will arise. I wasn’t there, so I can’t say what actually happened. But line drawing is tough, so I support the rule, as long as everyone knows ahead of time what the rule is.


95 posted on 05/03/2013 7:50:42 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: duffee
The rule says arms, from what I read he raised one arm.

This was a news item here in Austin on KLBJ. There was one caller who was at the meet and the anchor leg runner folded his arm at the elbow. He had his finger next to his ear like he meant "We're number one" after he crossed the finish line.

96 posted on 05/03/2013 8:08:34 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

As you know, end zone celebrations are allowed in the NFL. In fact, stupid celebrations after every frick-frackle tackle are allowed.


97 posted on 05/03/2013 8:22:52 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Of course flashing gang signs is probably perfectly ok.


98 posted on 05/03/2013 8:24:05 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stormhill
It's like a drumbeat of abuses against Constitutional freedoms with a feeling of helplessness to do something about it.

Agreed. I feel like that most of the time. I pray it influences the Lord to return quickly.

99 posted on 05/03/2013 8:30:29 AM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u

Had I been the coach of the losing team, I would refuse to accept the “win” under these circumstances.

Cheating, ineligibility, rule-breaking by the other side... sure. DQ them and I’d take the win by default.

But this? Hell no. I’d tell the UIL to go find some other losers to give this “win” to. I will not accept it.

I’d probably get fired, but at least I would have my dignity.


100 posted on 05/03/2013 8:37:01 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson