Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

OUTRAGEOUS!
1 posted on 05/02/2013 2:54:27 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: onyx

Koch Industries is not a publically traded company. L.A. couldn’t purchase stock if they wanted to.


2 posted on 05/02/2013 2:56:05 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Everywhere we look Liberals are trying to suppress and shutdown conservative speech.

These people care as much for liberty in their actions as they do for their garbage.


3 posted on 05/02/2013 2:59:03 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Hilarious. Apart from all the laugh lines about the sacred standards of journalism practiced by the LA Times as now constituted, there’s the additional piquant irony of the stony broke and deep in the red LA pension fund being brandished as a weapon by the same liberal pinheads who turned the city into a basket case.


4 posted on 05/02/2013 3:00:46 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Your talking about the L.A city council, there is no depth too low for them to go. They make Soros look conservative.


5 posted on 05/02/2013 3:01:08 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Civil Rights violation. Very clear.


6 posted on 05/02/2013 3:01:17 PM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

The reason to sell your stock in the LA Times is because it is a failing business model. However, if you want to sell because it is the PC things to do, well I guess that is okay as well.

But if you think your selling will have any effect one way or the other you don’t understand the way stocks work.

In order to sell, someone else has to buy. The more people wanting to buy then sell, the price of the stock goes up. If more people want to sell then want to buy, the stock goes down.

Outside of the stockholders none of that has any effect on the business itself (unless they own a lot of their own stock).

This all reminds me of how Rush will pick who will win a football game depending on which teams name is more PC. It the City of Los Angeles wants to pick stock based on how PC they are then go for it. The sooner they go bankrupt the better.

I hope they invest a lot in Green Energy and Battery Cars and wind mills. We know how these PC industries are doing.


9 posted on 05/02/2013 3:02:31 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (California does not have a money problem, it has a spending problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

If the Koch brothers offer LA Times subscriptions online, I’d buy one because they’d be one of the few conservative, large newspapers in the country.


12 posted on 05/02/2013 3:03:55 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx
yank investments by the city’s three pension funds in the Tribune Co., which owns the Times, if the company opts to sell the paper to someone who does not uphold “the highest terms of professional and objective journalism.”
Hellooo?... the reason LA Times has to be sold is because it's CRAP.
13 posted on 05/02/2013 3:03:57 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (You Must be Hated by Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Its outrageous... that the pension funds are still invested in the old buggy whip firm now. They should be placed in someplace financially viable regardless of who the old white elephant gets pawned off on.


14 posted on 05/02/2013 3:04:02 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Only a stupid liberal would invest pension fund money into a dying medium anyway.


15 posted on 05/02/2013 3:04:03 PM PDT by Fledermaus (I'm done with the GOP. Let them wither and die. We need to start over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

>> Legal experts say Rosendahl’s political motivations in directing the city’s pension funds could run afoul of the Kochs’ First Amendment rights.

Racketeering? Coercion?


25 posted on 05/02/2013 3:09:56 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

The Kochs have as much right to buy the paper as anyone.
I just wish they were actually as conservative as most people think they are.


29 posted on 05/02/2013 3:13:40 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

“City funds?” We didn’t know that the paper was communist-owned, but we do now.


32 posted on 05/02/2013 3:16:25 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals

#20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

http://rense.com/general32/americ.htm

(HURRY, commies!!!)


33 posted on 05/02/2013 3:21:36 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

““turning L.A.’s metropolitan daily into an ideological mouthpiece whose commitment to empirical journalism would be unproven at best,” Rosendahl wrote.”

And what is it now?


36 posted on 05/02/2013 3:26:23 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends




*SNORT*

Keep Free Republic Alive!

Donating Monthly would be Ideal.

Generous FReeper Sponsors are donating $10 for every New Monthly Donor

39 posted on 05/02/2013 3:29:28 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

“We cannot support the sale of the Times to entities who Times readers would view as a political transaction first and foremost, turning L.A.’s metropolitan daily into an ideological mouthpiece whose commitment to empirical journalism would be unproven at best,” Rosendahl wrote.

That’s really rich!


41 posted on 05/02/2013 3:44:55 PM PDT by Enten (I don't have islamophobia...I do have islamonausea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Satire?


42 posted on 05/02/2013 3:45:05 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Government leaders are threatening to intervene if a republican may purchase the local newspaper?


43 posted on 05/02/2013 3:48:06 PM PDT by ansel12 (Civilization, Crusade against the Mohammedan Death Cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

“the highest terms of professional and objective journalism.”

If that is a problem they should have never invested in the first place/

The LA Times is as big a DNC tool as the NY Times.


44 posted on 05/02/2013 3:56:12 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson