You miss the point, I am not trying to defend Gen Blathers argument per se, I am only pointing out that you are taking his argument out of context in a gutless manner. I would like you to take on his entire argument. I tend to reject any notion of single issues being a total definition of anyone.
A homosexual who stays in the closet and believes in limited government regulation and taxation is less of a threat to me than either a gay activist liberal OR a big government social conservative frankly. It’s a worthwhile discussion, but you only want to take on half the issue. Your anger and self righteousness, compared with your shallowness, is rather off putting.
My statement quoted his which was clear and unambiguous. That is the definition of being in context.
As you refuse to cite evidence that homosexuality is a part of conservative philosophy, I must conclude that you were simply grandstanding in support of pushing it on conservatives. That puts you in the liberal wing of the conservative movement.
Now again. either put up or shut up. When you show how a response to a direct quote, in context is out of context, ping me. When you show how homosexual acceptance is a conservative pillar, ping me.
Until that time, feel free to posture all you like. Because anyone with the ability to read can see that you cannot back up squat.