[Norm Lenhart]

My statement quoted his which was clear and unambiguous. That is the definition of being in context.

As you refuse to cite evidence that homosexuality is a part of conservative philosophy, I must conclude that you were simply grandstanding in support of pushing it on conservatives. That puts you in the liberal wing of the conservative movement.

Now again. either put up or shut up. When you show how a response to a direct quote, in context is out of context, ping me. When you show how homosexual acceptance is a conservative pillar, ping me.

Until that time, feel free to posture all you like. Because anyone with the ability to read can see that you cannot back up squat.

[C. Edmund Wright]

My statement quoted his which was ambiguous. That is the definition of being a con

So, you support ambiguity and conning people? Way to go Norm. In your own words, I have destroyed you. (no, you won't be smart enough to understand what I just did to you, but maybe someone can help you out).