Dems to demand that gay illegals be allowed to sponsor partners abroad

Hot Air ^ | May 1 ,2013 | ALLAHPUNDIT

[informavoracious]

The problem is, for many gays, everybody is their partner.

[forgotten man]

Of course the ones with HIV and AIDS can go to the front of the line for free health care.

[Hojczyk]

Got a letter today from Rubio he wanted money for the GOP....Sent it back no money ...I sent him money for his senate campaign..Wrote I would send Sarah money...I still trust her sort of....Why send money to a hopeless cause???

[Doogle]

morons

[Doogle]

shudda told him he can collect his donations from Mexicans

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Everybody is piling on the pyramid scheme now.

That means we are approaching the end of it.

[GeronL]

Talking about illegals ... wow

This bill must die

[madison10]

Da*&. That minority (gays) is going to take this country down one way or another.

[Secret Agent Man]

Yup.

If they aren’t their partner right now, give them a few days. “Thursday night off” comes once a week.

[tsowellfan]

morons

Unfortunately they are not. The gay marriage had a lot to do with gay Americans marrying their "partner" and getting a marriage visa to bring them here.

[Secret Agent Man]

“we are approaching the end of it”...

It isn’t just the pyramid scheme “end” we’re approaching.

[diamond6]

They are so trying to buy votes... sickening.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Only a superstitious pagan believes that an economic collapse has religious meaning.

[Doogle]

rats

[MAexile]

How do you say “Charlie Christ” in Spanish?

Marco Rubio.

[Starboard]

Got a letter today from Rubio he wanted money for the GOP....Sent it back no money
*********
Me too. Did the same thing with a “Friends of Boehner” letter except they got lots of negative comments from me!

[Amendment10]

What you're probably not going to find out concerning "government" immigration policy from any DC politician including RINO Rubio, or Obama guard dog Fx News is the following. Not only is the word immigration not a constitutonal term, but Thomas Jefferson had noted, in terms of the 10th Amendment nonetheless, and regardless of today's PC interpretations of Congress's naturalization powers (Clause 4 of Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution) that the Founding States had not delegated to Congress via the Constituton the specific power to regulate immigration, immigration a state power issue.

"4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force (emphasis added)." --Thomas Jefferson, Draft of the Kentucky Resolutions - October 1798.

[dontreadthis]

so I’m supposed to react with “ok, that’s it, now they’ve gone too far”?

[Secret Agent Man]

i don’t believe in superstitions, and i am not a pagan. however your cmment was intended, it was a double fail.