“Excellent - so basically you are saying that there is always an alternative to a homosexual adoption, which I can’t argue (someone else may). Therefore would you agree with Ryan’s point but not his premise because an alternative always exists?”
Let me rephrase:
Excellent - so basically you are saying that there is always an heterosexual alternative to a homosexual adoption, which I can’t argue (someone else may). Therefore would you agree with Ryan’s point but not his premise because an adoption by a heterosexual couple alternative always exists?
I do not agree with Ryan’s point at all. Even if, hypotheticaly speaking, there was not a married normal couple to adopt a child, a single normal person would be better, an orphanage if well run would be better, a group home if well run would be better.
No chlid should ever be placed with one or more mentally ill sex perverts. Got it?
But you’re the one who thinks not all faggots are perverts. You must have a very strange definition of the word “pervet” in your personal lexicon.