Skip to comments.
Pentagon Paying Chinese for Satellite Bandwidth
Washington Free Beacon ^
| 4/30/13
| Staff
Posted on 04/30/2013 10:59:56 AM PDT by Nachum
The Pentagon revealed late last week it is paying the Chinese $10 million for a one-year lease for a satellite that allows U.S. troops on the African continent to keep in touch and share information, Wired reports. The announcement has U.S. policymakers on edge. Over the last several years, the U.S. government has publicly and loudly expressed its concern that too much sensitive American data passes through Chinese electronics and that those electronics could be sieves for Beijings intelligence services. But the Pentagon says it has no other choice than to use the Chinese satellite.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bandwidth; chinese; nationalsecurityfail; pentagon; satellite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
04/30/2013 10:59:56 AM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
The Clinton Administration gave ballistic missile technology and other technology to the Chicoms. Handing over technology to China seems a priority to the Obama Administration.
2
posted on
04/30/2013 11:03:44 AM PDT
by
detective
To: Nachum
I guess the US is pretty confident their encryption is not vulnerable...NSA certified and all that.
They are wrong.
3
posted on
04/30/2013 11:03:45 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: Nachum
WE don't have our OWN military satellites ??!!?
Since when and why ?
4
posted on
04/30/2013 11:04:04 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: Nachum
Sure, what could go wrong?
To: Nachum
obama is in season...treason is the reason!
6
posted on
04/30/2013 11:06:56 AM PDT
by
ldish
(Give me Freedom and Liberty or let's kick some a**!)
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
What happened to the Iridium bandwidth?
8
posted on
04/30/2013 11:07:48 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: Nachum
We pay Russians to launch us up to our space station. Why not pay the Chinese to communicate with overseas troops?
9
posted on
04/30/2013 11:08:43 AM PDT
by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: Nachum
Of course.
The quislings have already sold off most US military resources to the chinese and the arabs anyway.
Think the US can make a single JDAM without buying the parts from china, who bought the producers and the rare-earth supplies from the US?
10
posted on
04/30/2013 11:10:18 AM PDT
by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
To: Gaffer
guess the US is pretty confident their encryption is not vulnerable...NSA certified and all that.
They are wrong.
And thats assuming they actually have to decrypt the traffic, as opposed to having a spy or mole simply provide them with necessary decryption info.
11
posted on
04/30/2013 11:10:21 AM PDT
by
rdcbn
To: fso301
Iridium bandwidth => pr0n.
12
posted on
04/30/2013 11:13:02 AM PDT
by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: rdcbn
There’s a Poofer PFC Manning app for that.
13
posted on
04/30/2013 11:13:12 AM PDT
by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
To: ldish
There isn’t one administration member who should escape the death penalty.
Not one.
14
posted on
04/30/2013 11:14:53 AM PDT
by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
To: Nachum
That’s real secure.
/ sarc.
15
posted on
04/30/2013 11:17:02 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
To: Nachum
"But the Pentagon says it has no other choice than to use the Chinese satellite." Pure B.S.
To: Hardraade
17
posted on
04/30/2013 11:24:09 AM PDT
by
ldish
(Give me Freedom and Liberty or let's kick some a**!)
To: Nachum
And, of course, the Chicoms aren’t tapping that bandwidth at all!!
(Is there anyone in the Pentagon who has even the slightest clue about . . . . . . . . . . . . . ANYTHING!!???)
18
posted on
04/30/2013 11:36:56 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(Congress - another name for anti-American criminals!!)
To: rdcbn
Even without the skinny....the decode of the traffic is just a matter of time and computing power.
19
posted on
04/30/2013 11:37:57 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: Nachum
Who was the idiot who thought this one up?
20
posted on
04/30/2013 11:37:58 AM PDT
by
0.E.O
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson