Posted on 04/29/2013 12:35:03 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
“Come to the U.S. and kill Americans! Even if you murder women and children, you will be guaranteed protection under our Constitution, ‘Mirandized’ and provided lawyers, along with top-quality medical care (if wounded in an escape attempt) … all at taxpayers’ expense. You could possibly even qualify for long-term quality care, with many free amenities, also at public expense, or perhaps, as an ‘enemy combatant,’ receive an all-expense-paid retirement on an island in the Caribbean.”
============================================================
With the incessant liberal prattle all week about the "right" of their darling little Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to remain silent under Miranda after detonating his shrapnel-jam-packed pressure cooker at the Boston Marathon, liberals have succeeded in safely shifting the conversation away from the sheer magnitude of murderous barbarism displayed by a couple of imported terrorists, (or, as the New York Times would prefer, a coupla misunderstood little lads just trying to fit in).
Instead, liberals would rather talk hysterically about how Tsarnaev's inalienable "right" to lawyer-up is inviolable because blowing up the Boston Marathon packed with civilians is no where near meeting the definition of a war crime -- not compared to, say, cutting Head Start.
Would libbies show the same fetish for phony legalism had the attack been on an airport (or airliner?)
Who can forget the paralyzing madness, the chaos and mayhem at airports across the country, with madmen trying to 'send a message' by attacking the airlines, paralyzing air travel and inciting panic?
But enough about Hussein Obama's FAA sequester.
(Say, what is it about men with Arab-sounding names and their penchant for attacking air travel?)
Out of their profound concern for school children, Democrats had hoped for another Sandy Hook massacre to get their gun bans through Congress, but I'm sure they'd never fantasize about a fatal airline accident resulting from sequestration because we all know how much they'd hate to blame Republicans for it.
The nexus between the Boston Marathon bombing and the failed Sequester is known technically as: Pervasive liberal idiocy.
With warmonger Bush finally off the stage, making peace with the Islamic world should be a piece of cake, prophesied Obama back in campaign '08. Even the Iranians will adore us, provided we aggressively plant our lips firmly enough on Ahmadinejad's Islamic backside. Four-plus years of Iranian backside lip-planting later, the mullahs reward Obama graciously, piling up Shiite loads of more centrifuges, even as Obama keeps paddling vigorously up De Nile.
Four-plus years of Times Square bombings, military recruiting office shootings, underwear bombers and Fort Hood terrorist attacks (excuse me, outbursts of non-Islamic-related workplace violence) by the lone wolf boys, mostly from Jihadistan basket-cases, but Obama is wedded as ever to lead Detective Janet Napolitano's working theory it's the Tea party activists (pining for that 35% vs 39.6% upper tax bracket) who ought to worry you.
But it's a short, straight line from Napolitano's conspiracy theories, to Iran's mad imams, to the brothers Tsarnaev's mad imom, who helpfully revealed last week that it was all just a buncha cans of red (outdoor) paint, not blood, shipped in by the CIA chaps who offed Martin Luther King Jr., JFK, RFK, leveled WTC building 7 and brought you the "fake" moon landing.
But if imom Tsarnaev is completely bananas, "imam" Obama has a sporting chance of competing in the same league. Instead of red paint, he's opted for barrels and barrels of red ink, emptied all over the joint for four uninterrupted years, and counting, premised on stimulus theories that if you make government fat and costly enough, presto! You've got prosperity.
Stimulus after stimulus after stimulus, and all Obama has to show for after all the red ink dumping are stunted Econ growth rates and sequesters, just as all the copious lip-planting expeditions gave us the Boston Marathon bombing.
The best argument conservatives have against liberalism is the cartoonish Barack Obama.
Anyway, that's...
My Two Cents...
"JohnHuang2"
Monday-morning ping! Have a great week, y’all!
bump!!
Hey stranger! How have you been?
And we should use that against the liberals in every campaign for the next 200 years.
They’re not terrorists. they’re presidential sympathizers.
The best argument conservatives have against liberalism is the cartoonish Barack Obama.
And we should use that against the liberals in every campaign for the next 200 years.
Yes, but the idiots among us will never recognize him for the evil bastard he is. The useful idiots of today can’t see what damage he’s done so the useful idiots of tomorrow are of no use.
This sumbitch placed one of his damned pressure cookers deliberately next to an eight year old child. If there was any justice in this world, they would make him sit on one and let it frikkin’ blow his worthless self to kingdom come.
That bastich said at the w h corresondent’s dinner that he wasn’t the strapping young muslim socialist he used to be. He was right. Now he is an older, angrier, uglier muslim socialist who is losing it more and more every day. That makes him far more dangerous than people realize.
That bastich said at the w h corresondent’s dinner that he wasn’t the strapping young muslim socialist he used to be. He was right. Now he is an older, angrier, uglier muslim socialist who is losing it more and more every day. That makes him far more dangerous than people realize.
You’re right. The evil bastard is one dangerous and evil demon who is going to go all out to destroy America in any and all ways he can.
He’s about to give REVENGE a new meaning.
His supporters had better wake up because they’re going to suffer as well.
Are liberals not behind the initiative to kill Americans with drones? Why are the leftists not consistent? Now they have Miranda rights? Or is all this an attempt to muddy the water?
Many articles about the terrorists seem to generate sympathy and "understanding." It is maddening!
That is too easy, way too easy and way to fast.
Thanks for the ping. As usual, another excellent essay
What about people accused like the Hutaree. Some of them spent as much as two years in jail before being acquitted?
I have not heard the name of the judge who inserted her/himself into the matter by going to the hospital to read him rights. The only rights I want to hear about are his last rights. But, what as the name of the judge?
So Kinchlow he have a point in any of that or was he just filling printspace? He said we’re a nation of laws but he doesn’t want to see the laws applied to terrorists. OK, I understand that. But he is also dismissive of having them classified as enemy combatants and shipped to Gitmo. So in all of that did he indicate what he did want done with them?
Terrorists captured in this country should have Constitutional Rights until they are convicted. Remember, we have a Regime (including the popular media) that is trying make the Tea Party, veterans, etc., into “potential terrorists.” They need some protection.
Once they’re convicted of murder, though, “Constitutional Rights” should go out the window, esp. that pesky clause about “cruel and unusual punishment.”
I’m just glad we all agree the Constitution means nothing. It’s refreshing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.