No no no no no. I don't care if he can prove it was gunpowder taken directly from bullets! It does not matter! If your mindset is that Lautenberg has no legitimate case to restrict gunpowder because it was not used in the boston bombs, I can guarantee that he will have proof gunpowder was used the next time something blows up. You can't let them get this foot in the door. Stop being the girl with low self esteem at the prom. Its ok to say NO.
When they say, "Why do you need an AR15?" Respond, "Why do you NEED a car that goes over 55mph?" "Why do you NEED that iPhone?" "More people die texting and driving fast in cars every single day, but no one wants to ban cars."
"Why do I need access to gunpowder? Why do YOU need access to alcohol? Alcohol kills more people every day than gunpowder."
Refuse to play. Its the only way to win against the relentless illogical lying insanity that is liberalism.
I agree but, at the same time, I don’t think it was gunpowder and I would love to expose this POS as the overzealous gun grabbing commie that he is. How sweet would it be to be able to excoriate him in the media for going after gun powder having not even bothered to confirm that it was actually gunpowder that was used? We could get years of play out of that.
Refuse to play.