Skip to comments.
Why Does DHS Need More Bullets Per Officer Than Army?
Investor's Business Daily ^
| April 26, 2013
| IBD EDITORIALS
Posted on 04/26/2013 3:46:50 PM PDT by raptor22
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Praise Obama and pass the ammunition?
1
posted on
04/26/2013 3:46:50 PM PDT
by
raptor22
To: raptor22
So what’s IBD’s opinion on this? It’s posted as an editorial.
2
posted on
04/26/2013 3:50:32 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: raptor22
You don't need guns anymore. We've got you covered.

3
posted on
04/26/2013 3:50:55 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: raptor22
I seem to recall this: We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives weve set. Weve got to have a civilian national security force thats just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
Nah, can’t be that.
4
posted on
04/26/2013 3:51:22 PM PDT
by
ri4dc
(Cut your cable. You'll need the extra dough later on. 'This war is lost!' The worst is yet to come.)
To: raptor22
"And just who is this inconsequential pisant who dares to question my actions?" 

5
posted on
04/26/2013 3:56:14 PM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(Welcome to Obama-Land - EVERYTHING NOT FORBIDDEN IS COMPULSORY)
To: raptor22
Simple. They need more so once they destroy the second amendment and declare martial law they can kill more of us.
6
posted on
04/26/2013 3:57:51 PM PDT
by
mardi59
(IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!!!!!)
To: Travis McGee
The only thing that really surprises me about these SWAT/SRT uniforms is that they haven't yet (to my knowledge) started wearing berets.
I've seen SWAT patches and badges that look suspiciously like Ranger tabs, SEAL badges, SAS devices, etc., so it's obvious who they think they are. I'm guessing the "SWAT beret" is just a matter of time.
7
posted on
04/26/2013 3:58:18 PM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends
8
posted on
04/26/2013 4:00:03 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: raptor22
Homeland Security said it had 263 million rounds of ammunition stockpiled as of November, which is more than two years worth.
In 2012, the department used 88.3 million rounds for training, and 27.9 million rounds for operational purposes. Customs and Border Protection, which includes the Border Patrol, used the most ammunition at nearly 38 million rounds, while Immigration and Customs Enforcement used more than 28 million rounds.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/25/sequester-tight-budgets-means-dhs-buying-less-ammu/#ixzz2RcL0z1lQ
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
**************
.....and 27.9 million rounds for operational purposes....
What do they use that many rounds on ‘for operational purposes’ when they have training listed as a separate category?
Any guesses?
9
posted on
04/26/2013 4:03:15 PM PDT
by
deport
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: raptor22
Dismissed as a concern only of right-wing conspiracy theorists, the reported amounts as high as 2 billion rounds have varied and been explained not as a one-time purchase but a bulk buy over five years to reduce costs. If that were true, there should be a pre-existing email trail that supports the concept.
Somebody needs to ask: If the purchases are for that reason, then how much savings per round/box/case would those purchase orders have accomplished over purchase orders totaling 80% of the total? 50% of the total?
In other words, how much, in actual dollars, will they save by purchasing the amount they have issued purchase orders for?
Surely they have those numbers easily available, right?
To: Joe 6-pack
they wore a raspberry beret, the kind you find a second hand store.
12
posted on
04/26/2013 4:10:41 PM PDT
by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...
13
posted on
04/26/2013 4:10:46 PM PDT
by
raptor22
(Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
To: raptor22
Uh, so they can stop by and shoot you?
14
posted on
04/26/2013 4:14:06 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: onyx
15
posted on
04/26/2013 4:14:53 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Paladin2
You betcha.
Pray, keep armed and ready.
16
posted on
04/26/2013 4:16:30 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: onyx
I looked for handgun ammo today at a previous retail supplier.
The store had some other merchandise on the shelves where the handgun ammo used to be displayed. I guess they have no anticipation of carrying inventory in the near future.
17
posted on
04/26/2013 4:21:12 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Paladin2
Whoa. Maybe they were out of stock?
18
posted on
04/26/2013 4:22:14 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: onyx
Maybe they had no reason to reserve any shelf space for handgun ammo for the foreseeable future?
19
posted on
04/26/2013 4:23:33 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: TurboZamboni
they wore a raspberry beret, the kind you find a second hand store. And if it was warm they wouldn't wear much more?
CC
20
posted on
04/26/2013 4:25:07 PM PDT
by
Celtic Conservative
(Tease not the dragon, for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson