Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer

I referred to the vest as being armored. I am probably wrong. Maybe it is considered a bulletproof vest but not armored.
I wonder if this guy goes for a walk every three weeks or every day. Just curious.


99 posted on 04/26/2013 8:32:40 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: cornfedcowboy

I’m not against what you said re: armor; that was in what I read this morning. I just know it isn’t all that easy to get, that’s all....there are ‘carrier’ vests, utility vests, some variations - let’s call them tac vetst. Some have pockets for breast plates (armor) and the various generations thereof for protection level.

For a civilian to buy one of these plates, there’d be some bucks involved, likely you could buy a nice revolver for that amount, a Mossberg pump, etc.

The media is trained to say armor, bulletproof, etc. when they see a vest. Just like they say AK when they see anything that has a barrel longer than a foot. For the others with barrels shorter than that, they are GLOCKs.


110 posted on 04/26/2013 8:37:51 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson