I just don’t see how a K-9 and his handler could not track this guy? I’ve seen a dog find a rock tossed down a hillside by its owner come back with the very same rock. Sometimes it took a while, but he always found it. In this case the dog had blood and maybe clothes, yet unable to track. Just saying..
Ditto, ditto, and ditto.
I can think of only two reasons, neither of which are worth a crap:
1. Muslims are sensitive about dogs, therefore no dogs - or
2. A bunch of cowboy want-to-be’s just had to run down the street in all their paraphernalia. No sense letting Fido have all the credit when we look so good going hut, hut, hut.
I agree, and posted about this yesterday.
The police quickly found the SUV he abandoned, and they should have been able to track him:
1. His scent/dogs
2. His blood trail (on Saturday a reporter showed some drops in the grass, and of course there was blood on the outside of the boat - he was leaving a trail like a wounded deer).
3. Gun Powder - the guy had been firing a gun and setting off bombs, and may have had gunpowder on him. Mechanical sensors or dogs may have been able to track him.
Boy did you nail it.
Muslims hate dogs.
Our rulers love muslims.
Had they turned loose several tracking hounds, they would have found this feral human quickly and would not have to terrorize law abiding citizens. But maybe that was the objective. Get citizens used to having their houses searched by heavily armed law enforcement.
Should have turned loose a pack of german shepherds and let them have their way with the little muslim f*****r.
just saying.