Friend of Tsarnaev: He Was a 'Pothead'

breitbart.com ^ | 19 Apr 2013 | Breitbart News

[Berlin_Freeper]

According to Chris Barry, a sophomore at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth and friend of Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, said that Tsarnaev “didn’t seem like a dangerous person at all … He was a pothead, a normal pothead. I couldn’t even imagine him being mad at someone, let alone hurting someone.”

[rusty schucklefurd]

re: ““didn’t seem like a dangerous person at all … He was a pothead, a normal pothead. I couldn’t even imagine him being mad at someone, let alone hurting someone.”

The “friend” is probably a pothead too and his perception may be a bit “blurry”.

[Vaduz]

Unexpected

/s

[CottShop]

[[Who is who here, and where do the Cannabis drugs fit in, in regards to you guys?]]

Not ap ot head- don’t do drugs-

[meyer]

A “normal pothead” would have swiped a bag of chips from the local quickie-mart and sat in the woods eating them while giggling uncontrollably.

This guy was not a “normal” anything.

[UCANSEE2]

I always find it odd when someone throws a hissy fit, ranting on and on and on for no reason, in a claim that SOMEONE ELSE is the FANATIC.

[UCANSEE2]

In regard to the claim the suspect was a pot head, there is also an article on FR mentioning that his 'only American friend' was found dead and his body was covered with 'pot'.

I find that odd.

[UCANSEE2]

Uh.... FR has a built in spelling function. Not that anyone pays any attention to it, based on some of the posts.

[UCANSEE2]

Uh huh, yeah man.

[UCANSEE2]

You’ve got a posting history abetted by a tagline that you’ve dragged into every thread you’ve been on.

We all do, my friends, we all do.

[UCANSEE2]

Not ap ot head- don’t do drugs-

Maybe you should consider it. It might improve your spelling.

: )

(no offense meant, you and I have discussed your spelling before, so it's just a 'taunt' between old friends. Besides, many of the posts contain spelling errors, so you fit right in)

[CottShop]

[[no offense meant,]]

None taken- it was pretty funny- It might at that-

[JustSayNoToNannies]

I’m pretty sure we’ll be seeign news stories abotu hte dangers of pot turnign folsk into bombers anytime soon

Who will be dumb enough to believe them?

[JustSayNoToNannies]

I do not know a single person which is a pot smoker who is a decent ,moral ,honest person at heart .

I've known several.

[Revolting cat!]

If we legalized it, then we’d have as many potheads as alkies, and it would become the new normal! Celebrutards would go into rehab and then onto TV to be worshipped anew. Potheads Anonymous would flourish, and even if you quit potheadding, you’d be declared a pothead for life according to Pee-Ei!

[JustSayNoToNannies]

explain how drugs are conservative?

Wrong question - the points are:

• that liberty means being free to make unwise choices such as drug use,
• that the only demonstrable effect of the War on Drugs is to hyperinflate drug profits and channel those profits into criminal hands, and
• that federal interference in within-state drug matters is unconstitutional.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

If we legalized it, then we’d have as many potheads as alkies

Says who? Are you claiming that the only difference between the two is their legal status?

[Revolting cat!]

I’m not claiming anything, and the word “claiming” is all yours. One hundred or so years ago pot and cocaine were legal and alcohol was illegal. The logic of those times (the logic that allowed it) wasn’t any worse than the logic of current times. That is, unless you are one of those “progressives”, who believe that we live in the best of all times and are smarter than all those who came before us.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

If we legalized it, then we’d have as many potheads as alkies

Says who? Are you claiming that the only difference between the two is their legal status?

I’m not claiming anything

You certainly did claim "If we legalized it, then we’d have as many potheads as alkies." And notice that I asked a question rather than making a claim.

One hundred or so years ago pot and cocaine were legal and alcohol was illegal. The logic of those times (the logic that allowed it) wasn’t any worse than the logic of current times.

Agree 100%.

[Berlin_Freeper]

- that liberty means being free to make unwise choices such as drug use,
- that the only demonstrable effect of the War on Drugs is to hyperinflate drug profits and channel those profits into criminal hands, and
- that federal interference in within-state drug matters is unconstitutional.

• There are people who want to unwisely drive faster than the speed limit. Doesn't mean they should be given the freedom to do it.
• Supposed hyper-inflated drug prices are only a concern to the criminal drug users transferring their money to the criminal drug sellers.
• Article VI of the U.S. Constitution contains the supremacy clause, which makes federal laws the “supreme law of the land” and forces states to follow the U.S. Constitution and all federal laws.

[dfwgator]

Wasn’t Charles Manson also a “pothead”?