Posted on 04/19/2013 7:03:28 AM PDT by JustSurrounded
Okaz, the same prominent Saudi newspaper, that published photos of Abdul Rahman Ali Issa Al-Salimi Al-Harbi in the hospital after the Boston marathon bombings, is now reporting that the Saudi national was also visited by the first lady of the United States, Michelle Obama during his hospital stay.
...
In light of recent reports that Alharbi was scheduled for deportation on ‘national security grounds’, the first lady’s visit takes on much added significance if those reports are true. We already know that the Alharbi clan consists of multiple Al-Qaeda members. This would seem to bolster the claims of scheduled deportation, not claims to the contrary made by the likes of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, who actually never really answered the question; she just got rankled and blew it off.
With the track record of this administration relative to things like blaming a video for two weeks after the Benghazi attacks, it should have a higher standard to meet and its credibility should be questioned by the American people.
If these reports about Alharbi’s scheduled deportation for such reasons are correct, a visit by the first lady of the United States would indeed be significant in its importance. It would also be a major national security blunder because of the message it would send.
(Excerpt) Read more at shoebat.com ...
No, the cash—and plenty of it—flows in the other direction.
HF
She lied??? I don’t believe it.
You got it.
[[Google Chrome warned me of Malware when I clicked on this thread. I proceeded anyway... “at my own risk”, of course.]]
Which thread? Tghe FR thread or the shoebat.com article?
And remember, anythign google deems conservative will not be raqted very high anyways
Huh? The BIG image I posted (it showed in preview) didn’t post.
Obama is probably on a golf course looking for the real terrorists.
Providing aid and comfort to the enemy. Just one of the many services the First Lady provides.s/
uninformed......
FR. The Google warning said there was malware from OCWeekly embedded in the page. It happened three times. This is the first time I’ve seen the message from Chrome.
Yes it “smells”.......... (if this story is true and I am not sure it is - lots of mis information in the news lately) so WHY would the Secret Service allow the First Lady any were near a would-be Saudi terrorist?? What is going on...
Probably something as “harmless” as tracking cookies.
Google tries to scare people off of conservative sites and pro conservative articles.
Just guessing here - because she has nothing to fear from him? After all - Quote from “The Audacity of Hope” [pg. 261]:
“Of course, not all my conversations in immigrant communities follow this easy pattern. In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific assurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
May God give us strength.
Tatt
You wrote:
“Big Sis (not a fan) is not an investigator. She will never sit in a chair at a federal court house under oath and relay facts.
Glenn Beck (I like him, but verify) is not an investigator and will never sit in a chair armed with real facts under oath that he is accountable for - he will move onto the next “story.”
In the midst of all this are professional investigators (good ones) who put their reputations and careers on the line because they write actual reports that document the real investigation (not media segments of speculation) that they will have to vigorously defend in court”
What is your point? I understand what it takes to prove a case in court. I also understand that the main stream media has ruined many people lives. So why are you telling me this?
I am not a huge Beck fan but I do have a pretty good track record on this website of taking the facts known, calling people I know and making my own educated guess as to what is the truth. I look at Mr. Beck spending 70,000,000 on a network, all his own money, and say to myself why would he risk all of that for this story? Unlike most stupid reporters who work for the networks HE OWNS HIS. So I will watch on Monday and see if he has thrown it all away.
My question to you is why do you dismiss him so quickly? Do you watch his program? Do you read the Blaze? Do you know he has hired many people who have run whole networks CNN, FOX, CBS? I know the backgrounds of the people he uses for research and respect them. They could be wrong but this is not some rag tag website like INFOWARS this is a whole network making this claim.
There have been thousands of false leads in connection with this story (as there are with every major breaking news event). Have any of reports of burns been corroborated?
How many days later is that picture taken after the event?
I believe the picture was posted online yesterday. So, three days after the bombing. Burns, particularly severe burns, don't heal that quickly.
I never read severe. Just burns.
Something is really rotten inside the tent....at least Glenn Beck has his nose inside and is taking a look-see.
Leni
hmmm- my norton interent security didn’t issue any warnings-
Even first degree burns (e.g., the equivalent of sunburns) can take a few days to heal. The types of burns that would be associated with bomb-making or detonating—and certainly the type of burns that would have gotten him admitted to the hospital—would likely be at least second-degree, and could take one to three weeks to heal. Unless they were very minor, it’s unlikely the guy was burned on Monday and then took a picture on Thursday (at the latest - that’s when it was posted) with no sign of burns.
And, again, if he had burns on his hands, he would not also have an IV in his hands.
Man Hands...both of them
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.