Posted on 04/18/2013 12:26:45 AM PDT by grundle
You left out the part where they searched everything he owned, talked to all his friends and relatives and couldn’t find anything that linked him to the bombing.
But, while they were going over all that stuff - they also determined that he is a national security risk - which, all by itself - merits deportation!
However, the latest report I hear (but it’s from un-named sources) is that he might be held for a while longer anyway. We’ll see ...
“EXCLUSIVE: Saudi Student connected to bombing set to be deported under ‘Security related grounds’”
https://www.facebook.com/GW.IFA/posts/606429586052362
“couldn’t find anything that linked him to the bombing”
So far.
Why is he being hustled out? With the aid of the Saudi Foreign Minister? Not diplomats from the Saudi Embassy, the Foreign Minister who flew here.
Nah. Something’s going on.
OPEC exists to fix petroleum prices. No question.
That said, we don't purchase Saudi oil, so making them happy to keep that supply flowing doesn't make sense.
OPEC countries need to sell their oil just as badly as other countries need to purchase it, so the prospect of them closing the spigot isn't that great.
Yes, they should all live in the Middle East under Sharia law.
So you want to kick out Muhammed Ali and Kareem Abdul Jabbar??
If you want to help with the Boston Marathon bombing investigation, instead of speculating about something that is not going to help it ... you might try the following, copied from the page ...
Geert Wilders IFA Friends
http://www.facebook.com/GW.IFA
GWIFA: Links that the FBI wants you to see ...
http://www.fbi.gov/news/updates-on-investigation-into-multiple-explosions-in-boston
http://www.fbi.gov/news/updates-on-investigation-into-multiple-explosions-in-boston/photos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M80DXI932OE
We’ll also note here that the FBI says that THESE PHOTOS (that come from the FBI itself) are the ONLY ONES the public should look at. Any other photos on the Internet will not help the FBI. They are EMPHATIC about that!
Speculating? I’m asking questions about identically dressed guys with identical backpacks.
Who are they? Why are they there? What are they doing? Who sent them? etc.
Are they undercover BPD? Undercover some federal agency? Completely plausible. Maybe they are there to monitor. It is a large crowd, maybe DHS was monitoring.
Maybe there was intelligence and extra precautions were taken.
Why the large packs?
Clearly these guys are together. They definitely are not civilian.
The FBI is emphatic. The fact that these guys are here and quite clearly the FBI is pretending they don’t exist underscores questions about them. Legitimate questions.
The FBI is emphatic because questions about these guys makes them uncomfortable. Why?
They said why ... they said “wasted resources” as they’re after those two guys. They’ve got video of both of them together and video of the one dropping the bomb at one of the bomb sites.
In other words, the FBI is after the perpetrators and not chasing conspiracy theories ... LOL ...
Yes two guys. AND NOBODY ELSE.
Asking questions is not a conspiracy theory, don’t be ridiculous.
As a matter of fact, the FBI wants two guys - which is a conspiracy. Are there others involved?
The photos the FBI referred to without naming came from the 4chan channel on imgur.com. Who took those pictures? Some of those pictures are from a second story window above the bomb-site. Who is the tenant there? Did someone associated with the tenant take those pictures? Is it a vacant office? Is it open to the public?
It could be just an average citizen noticing identically dressed guys.
There were identically dressed guys and that is not a conspiracy theory. Note that I am not attaching anything nefarious to them, I only ask who and why.
The only way answering these questions would be “wasted resources” would be if they don’t have the answer, if they don’t know who they are: in which case it wouldn’t be wasted resources to find out who they are. They are definitely not civilian.
The reason why the FBI is after those two guys is because the one with the white hat was on a video dropping the bomb off at one bombing location. And they both show up at both locations ... and in addition ... they are both together, following in single file.
When you’ve got a video of a guy dropping a bomb off at the bomb site, you go after him and his accomplice - and not some shadow on the roof ... LOL ...
And the pictures and video the FBI has released to the public is at these links:
http://www.fbi.gov/news/updates-on-investigation-into-multiple-explosions-in-boston
http://www.fbi.gov/news/updates-on-investigation-into-multiple-explosions-in-boston/photos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M80DXI932OE
We just found out that Steven Emerson’s source got it wrong. He was misinformed or didn’t have all the information! Unfortunately Steven Emerson was fed the wrong information. That doesn’t mean anything bad in regards to Steven Emerson himself, because he does a very good job and I’ve followed him from the mid-1990s. He’s excellent. But, when a source get it wrong - it’s going to spill over to you, if you’re relying on that source.
“Senior law enforcement official: Saudi national in ICE custody, unrelated to the Boston bombing”
https://www.facebook.com/GW.IFA/posts/606628032699184
I'd like to see that video, but apparently the FBI doesn't want me to. Curious.
Shadow on a roof? I’ve not referred to anybody on a roof. Why do you throw this out?
By all means go after the two suspects. BUT that doesn’t mean you ignore other related individuals.
You seem to be personally vested in this. If you or yours were in Boston, I’m sorry.
Don’t wear blinders.
Emerson might not have been misinformed after all:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3009567/posts
I guess will know for sure soon enough.
You get the guy who dropped off the bomb - you’ve got the whole thing. Everything is cracked open at that point. That’s why the FBI focus is there.
Get the ALL.
Well, you see, the FBI is not asking you to “work the case with them” - what they’re asking you to do is “identify” someone that they know dropped the bomb. It sounds like you’re interested in getting in on the FBI’s meetings and “working the case” with them ... :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.