'Gay' gypsy moths and porn addiction (human sexual orientation)

WND ^ | Arpil 15, 2013 | Judith Reisman

[Perseverando]

Exclusive: Judith Reisman covers latest science on pheromones, mating confusion

On Sept. 21, 2012, Texas neurosurgeon Donald L. Hilton Jr., M.D., spoke on pornography addiction and sexual orientation, saying:

“Pornography is a visual pheromone, a powerful 100-billion-dollar per year brain drug that is changing sexuality even more rapidly through the cyber-acceleration of the Internet. It is ‘inhibiting orientation’ and ‘disrupting pre-mating communication between the sexes by permeating the atmosphere’ and Internet.” (emphasis added)

Hilton’s lecture, “Changing the Stamp of Nature: Pornography Addiction, Neuroplasticity, and the ASAM and DSM Perspectives,” put a hard neuroscience face on pornographic brain rewiring, implicating sex-education promotions of homosexuality as a normal genetic variation.

Dr. Hilton cited Shakespeare on “addiction” directing “Each man to what … his addiction leads him” (Othello in Act II, ii 6), and my personal favorite: lust as “perjured, murderous, bloody, full of blame. … Enjoyed no sooner but despised straight” etc. (Sonnet 129). Reread the Bard as wisdom literature.

Shakespeare studied and “employed Scripture teachings, facts, poetry, philosophy and language in his writings” (William Burgess, “The Bible in Shakespeare,” Author’s Preface, The Winona Publishing Company, 1903), so he understood well the harms of sexual addiction, seen in Proverbs 6:27 ESV: “Can a man carry fire next to his chest and his clothes not be burned?”

Hilton detailed myriad studies of addiction, the first medical use of the word appearing in a 1906 report on “opium addiction.” In 1983, roughly 300 years after Shakespeare and 3,500 years after the Bible, Dr. Patrick Carnes coined the term “sexual addiction.”

So, no, there IS nothing new under the sun.

We’ve just been educationally and morally dumbed down enough for deviance to really catch up.

[Perseverando]

Dr. Judith Reisman

Your Brain On Porn

[gaijin]

Feminism begot porn, which begot male avoidance of fallout from feminism.

Gloria Steinem or MY HAND...?

Hmm....gosh, I WONDER, right?

[Mrs. Don-o]

This is true. Divorce lawyers are reporting a bg number of divorces triggered by Internet porn directed to the male. Visual sexual stimulation is a human equivalent of a pheromone. The male gets addicted to it, but it doesn't direct him to a real female (certainly not to his wife); it disorients him and makes him unfit for real mating behavior.

It simply wrecks normal sexual neurophysiology.

Similar results from female porn are to be expected (not so much the visual, as the text-romantic-trash), but not as much research has been done on that._

It seems everything in modern American culture is converging on the destruction of natural sex.

[RHS Jr]

Even if a thousand lawyers in black robes say porno is speech, it ain’t speech. If you turn off the video somehow and then only have sound, it becomes speech; but even pornographic speech is damaging to boys. Get that filth off the internet. Pushing a button to verify your age wouldn’t be allowed for beer or cigarettes! It’s obvious that Whusseington is totally corrupt and doesn’t care diddly about morals, the middle-class, original intent of the Constitution or offending conservatives. We need to warm up the pitchforks and torches.

[Amberdawn]

Hugh Hefner and the Beat generation preceded feminism.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

In 2007 Science magazine quoted National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) director Dr. Nora Volkow saying “her institute’s name should encompass addictions such as pornography, gambling and food … the whole field” of addiction

So I guess government should regulate our food intake to combat food addiction.