Skip to comments.
Obama: 'Unimaginable' Congress would 'defy' Americans on guns
Politico 44 ^
| 4/16/13
| Jenifer Epstein
Posted on 04/16/2013 8:13:02 AM PDT by To-Whose-Benefit?
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
Ah, right on schedule, the t*rd speaks.
2
posted on
04/16/2013 8:13:46 AM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
I’m an American, Obama, and I don’t want congress to take any action at all.
Do I not count or something?
3
posted on
04/16/2013 8:14:33 AM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
He’s a genius in his own mind.
Narcissists generally do NOT do well when they are voted against. Interested to see what he tries after the gun bills fail.
4
posted on
04/16/2013 8:14:43 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
Then they need to man up and declare the 2nd amendment null and void.
I dare them.
5
posted on
04/16/2013 8:15:02 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
Obama: 'Unimaginable' Congress would 'defy' Americans on guns Yes, it would be... so Congress should leave the laws as is.
6
posted on
04/16/2013 8:15:03 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
If I’m not mistaken, we overwhelmingly did NOT WANT OBAMBICARE . . . what was it? . . . 76% against it?
So why did we get THAT shoved down our throats?
And where in the hell did this sock-puppet hear that Americans overwhelmingly wanted gun control? Are his handlers feeding him stupid things to say?
7
posted on
04/16/2013 8:15:10 AM PDT
by
laweeks
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
Surrounding yourself with mindless sycophants does have it’s downside.
8
posted on
04/16/2013 8:15:35 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
What’s ‘Unimaginable’ is that after we had Obama in action for 4 years, our own party threw the election so we could get stuck with Obama for another 4 years.
9
posted on
04/16/2013 8:16:10 AM PDT
by
To-Whose-Benefit?
(It is Error alone which needs the support of Government. The Truth can stand by itself.)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
If that's the case, Hussein, why not hold a national referendum?
I dare ya.
10
posted on
04/16/2013 8:16:48 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth." --Alan Greenspan)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
11
posted on
04/16/2013 8:17:05 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
Bam-bam is deliberately lying.
If Congress were responsive to the "overwhelming instinct of the American people" it would be hastily repealing gun laws.
12
posted on
04/16/2013 8:17:33 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
Unfathomable the One would claim consensus and ownership of this issue.
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
The ‘overwhelming instinct’ of Americans knows WHY the government was to registers everyone’s guns; To confiscate them.
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
In other words, He finds it objectionable that Congress seems unwilling to go along with his Treasonous Acts.
15
posted on
04/16/2013 8:18:28 AM PDT
by
eyeamok
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
President Obama can't see how Congress could buck public opinion to vote against new gun laws, he said in an interview released Tuesday.Oh, really, ZerO? You sure were glad they did it when they passed Obamacare, weren't you?
16
posted on
04/16/2013 8:18:36 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: To-Whose-Benefit?
well, Mr. President, first of all, Congress better vote against the people if what the people want is unconstitutional... secondly, there is not an overwhelming sentiment for gun control... thirdly, you didn’t have this attitude of Congress going against the will of the people when you pushed Obamacare... you simply do not know what it is to be an American... you do not get it...
To: rarestia
He seems to be pretty upset at the founders who put some circuit breakers in place to keep fools like this from getting their way 100% of the time.
18
posted on
04/16/2013 8:18:45 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
You have to also keep in mind that confiscation isn’t the “holy grail” for them.
It’s what they can/want to do AFTER confiscation that we should be rubbing their nose in.
19
posted on
04/16/2013 8:20:04 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: chris37
20
posted on
04/16/2013 8:20:21 AM PDT
by
EEGator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson