Replies

This is another reply to a post from another thread which I'm attempting to steer back onto the rails of this thread. Apologize for any confusion.

BTW, who do you think sent live explosives to Joe Arpaio, and if you had gone as far as the evidence trail could initially take you, what reasoning would you use to look for potential suspects?

Start by immediately assuming that this must tie in to the vast conspiracy which I already know in my heart exists.

Oh, woops, you asked what I would do. Well, then: If I'm completely out of evidence and haven't found crap, I would make some assumptions based on past mail bombers. Smart, maladjusted person who feels like he was wronged by the Sheriff in the past. I'd start with everyone he's ever locked up... there's been quite a bit of violence against criminal justice department types lately, and a lot of times it's a past perp. Could have been someone who saw the news about the prosecutors getting wacked in Texas and decided that was a good idea.

If you run out of people with a specific grudge, you're basically hosed because 'well educated person who has a bad opinion of Sheriff Joe based on watching the evening news' is an awfully big net to cast. At that point, I'd watch and wait for the person to try again.

That’s a reasonable espistemology, which I’m sure that law enforcement is using and which I also would use.

Is there any group of people that you would automatically rule out because it might look like you were a conspiracy theorist?

BTW, you do also realize that shortly after Arpaio announced that the CCP would be investigating Obama’s documentation, Eric Holder initiated an investigation against Sheriff Joe and eliminated his ability to access records he had been previously able to access on law enforcement grounds, right?

It’s not evidence, it’s just another piece of the big puzzle.

All of the media reports spent more time talking about Holder’s investigation of Arpaio and the White House’s reaction to the presser than to ANY piece of evidence presented at the presser. Not hard to do, because NONE of Arpaio’s evidence was mentioned in the press reports. Theyh all intimated that Arpaio’s investigation of Obama’s documentation was in response to Holder’s investigation of him, and none reported the fact that Holder initiated his investigation AFTER Arpaio put the CCP on the Obama case.