He’s not gonna engage. He says even if this technology was available it would be no big deal because the concept is absurd. Being able to assassinate people without anybody knowing it was murder is no big deal to this guy. It’s just what every murdererer or potential murderer on the face of the planet has been trying to come up with...
Unbelievable. If that is “no problem” then I wonder what WOULD be a problem, according to him.
If a technology exists that allows the government to kill people with zero evidence left behind, there is nothing to be done. There is nothing that you can do, because, well, there is no evidence. Every death of every person would be a possible assassination and also possibly a natural death. It would be impossible to know even if the technology was being used.
I presume you have a method for proving something for which there is, by definition, absolutely no evidence?