Posted on 04/12/2013 10:10:53 AM PDT by servo1969
If the Repuboicans have a strategy about this it is the Dems only have 49 votes, which includes Republicans. So this will go nowhere.
Republicans win the battle however come election time the Rats will accuse the Republicans of wanting to kill children.
And that children is how the Democrats plan on taking back congress.
Oh please do tell more... I feel like Diogenes looking for one good man..
liberals don’t stop. rinos and gop elite do.
No, you scummy little worm (Grahamesty). We do not need to “debate” the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. They’re not subject to debate or negotiation. Your duty as a U.S. Senator is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, so help me God!! That means you vote this Marxist crap down anytime and every time it rears it’s evil head!!
Hear, hear!
sounds like he wants to play politics with this
but history shows no evidence of Rino’s out-politicking Dems
I got an email from my state senator whose flowery message indicates she is voting the way of the voter. Then I read an article she is doing nothing of the sort. If anything she is voting the opposite.
LOL - tru dat...unfortunately.
[[Many senators have refused to take a position on some of these gun control issues for fear of angering one side or the other. Theres only one way to see where Senators actually stand on the Second Amendment make them vote. ]]
Please rewrite him and tell him “With all due respect you dolt- it doesn’t matter where they stand on the constitution- the constitution does NOT stand or fall on what position later generatkions take on the issue- the second amendment was put in place tyo protect us fro mthe lieks of peopel like you- peopel with no spine- peopel who think popularity trumps constitutional RIGHTS’
[[Why not humiliate the rats with a filibuster,]]
Because that woudl have been the RIGHT thing to do- stop the rats in their tracks- stop them from violating our constitution- but nope- the dolts think that ‘voting’ on whether the second amendment realyl means what it says is apparently a much better approach? How abotu we just assume our foundign fathersw MEANT what they said and leave it at that and SHUT DOWN ANY DOLT that tries to violate thsoe RIGHTS
[[I wonder just how much debate they will actually have.]]
We already KNOW that htey were BRIBED into acceptign the vote by beign invited to a swanky mega yacht with booze *(and probably bimbos too) to party liek htere was no tommorw whuile Americans went without- So yeah- I’m not holdign my breath that htese TRAITORS will do the right thing by stopping hte left in their tracks-
Since when does a citizen’s constitutional right require debate on the Senate Floor? I reject the premise of of this letter.
Spell check is our FRiend.....
You catch the last point?:
“· Finally, I have my own legislation, supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA), which I want to bring forward in the Senate. My legislation would make a real difference in keeping guns out of the wrong hands. “
If that isn’t a version of “Just the tip, just for a second, just to see how it feels” . . . .
He could have included a reference to that bill, if this is going to be as wildly popular with strict constitutionalists as he thinks it will be.
IOW, he was for it before he was against it?......
You’re lucky. My senators (flake and mccain) never bothered to answer.
The response is obviously completely canned, there's nothing personalized about it. Did you ask her questions in your email that weren't answered?
She'll be gone come the primary.
Uber RINO Lindsey Ping
"Republican by day, Democrat by night."
Want on or off this ping list?
Just FReepmail me.
h/t to martin_fierro for the graphic
Thanks for the ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.