Posted on 04/10/2013 1:32:46 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
President's Obama's call for a 94-cent-a-pack hike on federal cigarette taxes to fund early childhood education programs is controversial.
Anti-smoking groups applaud the proposal, but some tax experts and tobacco companies are against it.
The case for the tax. The tax is being presented as way to fund education and reduce smoking rates. It would raise roughly $78 billion over 10 years.
"The proposed tobacco tax increase would have substantial public health benefits, particularly for young Americans," the president's budget read. "Researchers have found that raising taxes on cigarettes significantly reduces consumption, with especially large effects on youth smoking."
After a 62-cent-a-pack tax hike was passed in 2009, cigarette sales dropped by 10%, according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
more....
Why it may be a bad idea. The biggest argument against the tax is that it will fund early childhood education on the backs of the poor. Not only is the tax not progressive - it does not go up the more money one makes -- but a higher percent of smokers are middle or low income.
The median household income for a smoker in 2011 was $27,700 compared to $45,761 for nonsmokers, according to Reynolds American (RAI, Fortune 500), a cigarette maker which is, unsurprisingly, against the tax.
Nearly half of all smokers had a household income of less than $25,000 a year. Meanwhile, under 15% of smokers had a household income over $75,000.
more...
(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...
Does home-grown taste good?
Yes, for the major reason that all the additives aren't in it that you find in the mass market products. Additives, I might, that are required by the same government that sued the major manufacturers.
you are a dork
-— . Additives, I might, that are required by the same government that sued the major manufacturers. -—
Ugh.
I would rather be a dork than a supporter of the O’s tax raising.
It’s time for a Wig Tax so Moochelle will pay her fair share.
well that’s good because you are a dork
Cigarette taxes in the United States
In a study conducted on behalf of the New York State Department of Health, it revealed that low-income smokers (those in households making under $30,000), spent an average of 23.6% of their annual household income on cigarettes, compared to 2.2% for smokers in households making over $60,000.[15]
What are you, 13, noob? Even my 14yo gave that nonsense up a few years ago.
I’m sure you have a habit that others wouldn’t like and would be rather peeved if they supported taxing you for it - or are you happy with taxing all things everyone, including you, that others dislike? I seriously doubt you would be, thus you are not only a tax hiking O supporter, you are a hypocrite.
I take being called a dork by the likes of you as a high compliment.
Wunderbar. Just frickin’ wunderbar.
Thanks for the ping!
Oops. Despite having spent so many childhood summer weekends on the Eastern Shore it slipped my mind.
Best regards
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts caught up with a friend of mine for her on-line purchases.
They wanted the unpaid taxes,plus interest and penalties.
She was 75 years old and fighting cancer,
They wouldn’t even let her make installment payments without adding more interest and penalties.
Despicable people !
.
Nothing in this budget proposal is actually going to get through the House or even see the floor.
Its a federal tax so it doesn’t help the honest entrepeneurs involved in state to state cigarette tax arbitrage. (I won’t call them smugglers, the real criminals are greedy statists who rob people of their money for their own good of course).
Henceforth, you will be known as poopyface.
My attorney put in the word henceforth.
lol
“Same with smokers. They are stupid.
So are people who insult others...........”
You just called yourself stoopid
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.