Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Actually Santorum new that Specter could WIN. Toomey would have lost his a$$ that election. He needed to wait for a positive easy Republican win of 2010. Toomey NEVER would have won that race that Specter won. Them are the facts there, bub.


23 posted on 04/06/2013 1:15:05 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator
He needed to wait for a positive easy Republican win of 2010.

The facts about Toomey are that I said that Santorum was "devoted to defeating him and keeping in Specter".

You didn't explain that, why was Santorum so devoted to Specter and against Toomey, that he supported Specter in 2010?

24 posted on 04/06/2013 1:55:26 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson