How magnanimous of them.
A distinction without a difference.
Anyone who would kill a baby would probably lie as well.
How highly thoughtful of the bloody butchers. But if they haven’t quite made it out of the birth canal, they’re ok to be slaughtered in a way even worse than we slaughter cattle to eat.
But, what about the Kenyan-born, illegal alien living in our White House? I thought he was totally in favor of letting these poor babies that were “accidentally” born be mercilessly killed by being thrown into medical waste bins or put in pans and put in closets until the little ones cry themselves to death. Huh? What about that, Planned Predators?
It’s a shame that these filthy, sick bastards are getting even a penny from our tax money.
I’m sure that will come as a relief to the babies they left to die after botched abortions over the past decades.
/ sarc.
Odumb@$$ is probably throwing a temper tantrum right now as he is reading FreeRepublic. he has to know where to get his information as the White Hut is the place of misinformation. Gee, did not he say “any woman who goes for an abortion, should get a successful abortion, if the baby is born alive, the baby should be killed’ here it is left to die.
always keep this in mind - Obama’s mother Stanley Ann Dunham threw away the baby and what America has is really the afterbirth. A blob.
However partial birth abortions I bet are still OK with PP.
The organization believes that taking a life should only be legal when the life is in the mother's womb.Doh! Hits head! But, of course. That makes sense... What scum these PP people are. Here's a picture I took at a march close to my home. My daughter looked at it and said, "Mom, do you SEE anything in that picture?" I didn't but after awhile I saw what she saw. The shadow on the little girl's sign looks somewhat like a baby with its arms extended and hooked to the "l" in Planned, where one can imagine the baby getting its blood sucked dry. Bloodsuckers!!! All of them. Jesus, please save us.
In response to recent discussion regarding Planned Parenthood’s position regarding abortive fetuses who are nonetheless born alive, we would like to take this opportunity to eliminate any confusion.
Let it be clear; Planned Parenthood does not condone, nor do we support, the killing of an extra-uterine fetus. We feel the only acceptable killing of a fetus is minutes earlier, when it is still in the womb.
Planned Parenthood does, however, support emerging technologies that would re-introduce the fetus into the womb in case of accidental live birth (a process called “de-birthing”).
Once replaced in the womb, the fetus may safely and legally be killed using usual humane abortion methods, such as burning it in a saline solution, dismemberment, or severing of the cervical spine without anesthesia.
We feel this stance is moral and consistent with the values of the average American. We maintain that those who disagree wish to drag modern America back to the dark ages, when people were routinely burned alive, dismembered, or decapitated in a savage manner. Do we really want to go back to that?
In summary, we support ethical abortion, just as we always have. Abortion is ethical. Seriously. There is no cognitive dissonance in that statement. Absolutely none. And if there is, you are a bigot, just like those mentioned in the previous paragraph.
We resent any attempts by our opposition to portray us as sadistic torturous monsters and apologize for any confusion that has resulted from those who mis-characterize our position.
As you can see, we are caring, compassionate individuals who want only the best for society.
/sarcasm
“Planned Parenthood’s description of the infanticide of abortion survivors as an “extremely unlikely event”
I’d bet that it happens more often than for the frequency of abortions that are provided to those that become pregnent as a result of rape.
People who worship at the alter of abortion are vile creatures. This is a no win situation for them. Now they have admitted they are killing humans for their sick sacrifices.
I didn’t realize killing an out of the womb living baby was something they, the doctor or the mother could decide. I would think at this point it would legally become murder.
Where is the logic in such a statement?
In such scenarios, or the "scenario presented," according to this PP representative, at what point do "physicians" face "life-threatening circumstances" with regard to the "infant"? Does she mean that at some point in the procedure this "infant" suddenly deserves life-saving "appropriate care," whereas, only seconds before, the "infant" was undeserving of that "appropriate care"?
The foundation principles underlying the American Declaration of Independence and its "Supreme Law of the Land"--the Constitution--rely on a fundamental premise:
"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them." - Thomas Jefferson, Author, Declaration of Independence, & President
Creator-endowed life, and the right to enjoyment of liberty, under our 1787 Constitution, were not grants by mothers, physicians, or government: such rights come from a "Creator," thus, "unalienable."
“If it can save just one life...”
sshhhh.. not those lives,the other ones,wait I’m all mixed up.
I am glad, but. . .
WHY NOT?
Every reason they give to kill them inside could be used to kill them outside. This is not a sensible position; although I am glad for it.
Does PP have any idea of how assinine they sound, either way? Yes, we want to kill babies, but if we screw it up, we’ll help them. Why is is a baby now, but not 10 minutes earlier?
As Hillary would say, “what, at this point, is the difference?”
How kind of them. But you know the fang-toothed feminazis are going to leap on them for this and make them go back on their word.
I wonder how long it is gonna take until they start arguing that babies are eligible to be aborted even after they are born, and you should be allowed to have an abortion even after the baby has a natural, regular birth. Have they or any other abortion advocates already started arguing this? I know partial birth abortion is like a half way point to this step; have any abortion advocates thus far called for going all the way and allowing a baby that has already been born naturally to be considered fair game for abortion?
“Planned Parenthood clarified Thursday that it is not in favor of killing babies who survive a botched abortion.”
A step in the right direction. Let’s see many, many, many, many, etc., more in the right direction from them.