The NRA says it's "most unconstitutional" legislation of the session.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
We need a database of individuals that should be prohibited from governing others.
2 posted on
04/04/2013 7:49:01 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(The Palin Doctrine.)
To: Repeal The 17th
Gun ban is fine for dangerous folks such as Leftists, and Dim pols.
3 posted on
04/04/2013 7:50:03 PM PDT by
grumpygresh
(Democrats delenda est.)
To: Repeal The 17th
Heck, the would be gun grabbers don't get get it. They suspect we're all dangerous. Well, we are - dangerous to their socialist/fascist plans for control.
I will not submit. Molon Labe!
4 posted on
04/04/2013 7:50:57 PM PDT by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Repeal The 17th; All
(Hey, a car is a weapon, too...why stop @ firearms? Let’s deny people subjectively deemed as “dangerous” a driver’s license, too! And picking up a steak knife @ a restaurant? Ah, ah, ah...no...no-no! Naughty! Naughty!)
6 posted on
04/04/2013 7:51:17 PM PDT by
Colofornian
(If BoM is everlasting gospel, why no god as exalted man, 3 glorious degrees, men becoming gods, etc?)
To: Repeal The 17th
Profiling is OK when the brown shirts do it.
8 posted on
04/04/2013 7:52:30 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(I predict the exact same Freepers will hate the GOP Candidate for: 2016,2020,2024,2028, 2032.)
To: Repeal The 17th
How Soviet of them. Welcome to the USSA, comrades.
10 posted on
04/04/2013 7:54:27 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Repeal The 17th
I don’t like the cut of Obama’s jib!
Let’s turn him in!
12 posted on
04/04/2013 7:56:21 PM PDT by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Repeal The 17th
What qualifys an RN?
What qualifys a GP?
13 posted on
04/04/2013 7:57:34 PM PDT by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Repeal The 17th
It is unconstitutional. Accumulating such a nefarious data base by the government, and then using that “data” to penalize or stigmatize without due process, not only violates individual rights but is Orwellian.
To: Repeal The 17th
J'accuse is the only rule the Left wants. And to think I once wanted to live in Colorado.
16 posted on
04/04/2013 8:00:11 PM PDT by
Trod Upon
(Every penny given to film and TV media companies goes right into enemy coffers. Starve them out!)
To: Repeal The 17th
17 posted on
04/04/2013 8:01:12 PM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
To: Repeal The 17th
What the hell is wrong with Colorado?
Is everybody there on dope now?
18 posted on
04/04/2013 8:01:45 PM PDT by
greene66
To: Repeal The 17th
I keep telling you folks, they are going for all the marbles this time. They believe that only rebellion can stop them; and they don’t believe that the people have the will to do that.
Confiscation IS the game plan. For certain.
20 posted on
04/04/2013 8:06:13 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: Repeal The 17th
Colorado and Connecticut, the newest acquisitions to North Korea.
23 posted on
04/04/2013 8:08:30 PM PDT by
GenXteacher
(You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
To: Repeal The 17th
Nothing more dangerous than someone not voting for the Bolshies.
25 posted on
04/04/2013 8:15:40 PM PDT by
depressed in 06
(America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
To: Repeal The 17th
Documentation File on the negative impact of the Obamanation Counterculture on America.
27 posted on
04/04/2013 8:17:58 PM PDT by
Graewoulf
(Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: Repeal The 17th
Ooo, a slight rewrite would make things amusing:
“DENVER Legislation that black people who are suspected of being dangerous from possessing a firearm is expected to be introduced in Colorado, setting up the next fight over gun control laws.”
Not terribly grammatically correct, but you see the idea.
To: Repeal The 17th
The measure would provide an additional tool for mental health professionals short of having someone committed if they make this conclusion. "We need to be concerned about people having guns who really can't handle them responsibly," McCann said Thursday.
"The main purpose of the bill is to identify people, because of mental health or substance abuse issues, who really should not be able to purchase and possess weapons."
I'm sorry but if the Democrats are going to go back to 1860 and start rolling back civil rights they need to commit people in order to do it or go before a judge.
31 posted on
04/04/2013 8:24:45 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Obama's vision - No Job is a Good Job)
To: Repeal The 17th
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.
― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
32 posted on
04/04/2013 8:24:59 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson